Thin oval bottom had slightly tapered to round for the top hand. He'd never used binding so I explained the gains from a good handle, with good binding and therefore the 1.5 was a change from the norm.
What was it! Might be one I wasnt going to answer ;-)
Copied from P1:
Not wanting to derail, thought I'd start my own.
A comment made in his thread got me wondering about pros having bats made at a particular place. Let us imagine a scenario.
Pro player X is sponsored by Kookaburra/GN/GM (you get the point) but actually pays to have his bats made by Salix/H4L/SAF (you get the point). The bats are of course labelled up as the sponsor's product.
The small batmaker who is paid by the pro selects his best willow to go into the pro's bats. As desribed, low density, high performance, short life.
Pro gets some top bats and is happy.
Now, here's the thing. Assuming that the real identity of the batmaker is kept secret as part of the contract, so the batmaker cannot profit from using the name of the pro is his marketing, what does the batmaker get from the deal? How does it differ any more from you or I ordering a bat from him? Why is the batmaker so determined to keep his best wood for the pro when he benefits no more from it than a normal sale?
I must say it grinds with me a bit when I hear a batmaker saying he holds back his best for the pros. Is their money better than ours? Why should we not be given the option of the best materials?
Before someone points it out, I realise the situation is very different is the small batmaker does indeed sponsor the player. It makes more sense in that circumstance.