Custom Bats Cricket Forum

Equipment => Bats => Topic started by: norbs on September 13, 2012, 09:14:59 AM

Title: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: norbs on September 13, 2012, 09:14:59 AM
As we approach show dates of new ranges what do you reckon we'll start to see bat profile wise?

Retro is one from the long established brands

Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: ajmw89 on September 13, 2012, 10:02:04 AM
Big edges, flat faces seem to be all the rage
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: petehosk on September 13, 2012, 10:07:00 AM
Big edges, flat faces seem to be all the rage

You're right! I just hope they don't all do that.
Flat face is ok and you get used to it, but still prefer the non-flat face if I'm honest.

I was hoping to see less cancaving on bats for 2013!
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: ajmw89 on September 13, 2012, 10:11:34 AM
Never used a flat face before.  Will have to try and have a few balls with our wicketkeeper's bradbury, as that appears to have a flat face...
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: uknsaunders on September 13, 2012, 10:20:59 AM
Like to see some big spine bats like the Distinction, with a flat face but some decent edges. Possible?
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: petehosk on September 13, 2012, 10:36:07 AM
Sounds like procricket's new bat!
That looked to have ample edges with quite a large spine.
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: Manormanic on September 13, 2012, 10:36:39 AM
Like to see some big spine bats like the Distinction, with a flat face but some decent edges. Possible?

its possible, but I wonder if it would fall between the two stools commercially?
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: uknsaunders on September 13, 2012, 11:44:21 AM
big enough edges to carry the infield with a huge middle - sounds a right commercial success to me. Whether somebody can make something with 25-30mm edges and a large spine, at a weight you can lift is another matter.
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: Manormanic on September 13, 2012, 11:59:37 AM
indeed - and whether even at a lighter weigh it would have the necessary balance.
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: uknsaunders on September 13, 2012, 12:10:53 PM
I was just looking at my GM Icon+ - it has 35mm edges / concaved 67mm spine (I think) and is 2'10 (mines a bit lighter than most but in the 2'11-2'12 region). So a slightly smaller edge / higher spine ie. 20-30mm / 70-80mm might be possible around 2'10-11. How big is the spine on a distinction?
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: Manormanic on September 13, 2012, 12:35:27 PM
I was just looking at my GM Icon+ - it has 35mm edges / concaved 67mm spine (I think) and is 2'10 (mines a bit lighter than most but in the 2'11-2'12 region). So a slightly smaller edge / higher spine ie. 20-30mm / 70-80mm might be possible around 2'10-11. How big is the spine on a distinction?

mine is 75 or 76 mm I think, with edges that are either 22 or 29 mm depending whether youaccount for the rounded fce.
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: Canners on September 13, 2012, 03:53:19 PM

big edges, high spines and lower middles is my guess
Title: Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
Post by: SkipperJ on September 13, 2012, 05:22:56 PM
I'm not sure whether we will see more of this, but I would like to see more Newbery Tour'esque profiles. People just don't seem to realize what they are really asking for when they ask for big edges. What they really want is a bat that will play well even for off-center shots. A convex profile would seem to be ideal for this.

Of course, fashion/fads can't necessarily be rationalized ...