Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: so what are we going to see for new ranges  (Read 1708 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

norbs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 821
  • Trade Count: (0)
so what are we going to see for new ranges
« on: September 13, 2012, 09:14:59 AM »

As we approach show dates of new ranges what do you reckon we'll start to see bat profile wise?

Retro is one from the long established brands

ajmw89

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2036
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • 4XI ornament
    • Wright Cricket
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2012, 10:02:04 AM »

Big edges, flat faces seem to be all the rage

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2012, 10:07:00 AM »

Big edges, flat faces seem to be all the rage

You're right! I just hope they don't all do that.
Flat face is ok and you get used to it, but still prefer the non-flat face if I'm honest.

I was hoping to see less cancaving on bats for 2013!
Logged

ajmw89

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2036
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • 4XI ornament
    • Wright Cricket
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2012, 10:11:34 AM »

Never used a flat face before.  Will have to try and have a few balls with our wicketkeeper's bradbury, as that appears to have a flat face...

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2012, 10:20:59 AM »

Like to see some big spine bats like the Distinction, with a flat face but some decent edges. Possible?
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2012, 10:36:07 AM »

Sounds like procricket's new bat!
That looked to have ample edges with quite a large spine.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2012, 10:36:39 AM »

Like to see some big spine bats like the Distinction, with a flat face but some decent edges. Possible?

its possible, but I wonder if it would fall between the two stools commercially?
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2012, 11:44:21 AM »

big enough edges to carry the infield with a huge middle - sounds a right commercial success to me. Whether somebody can make something with 25-30mm edges and a large spine, at a weight you can lift is another matter.
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2012, 11:59:37 AM »

indeed - and whether even at a lighter weigh it would have the necessary balance.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2012, 12:10:53 PM »

I was just looking at my GM Icon+ - it has 35mm edges / concaved 67mm spine (I think) and is 2'10 (mines a bit lighter than most but in the 2'11-2'12 region). So a slightly smaller edge / higher spine ie. 20-30mm / 70-80mm might be possible around 2'10-11. How big is the spine on a distinction?
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2012, 12:35:27 PM »

I was just looking at my GM Icon+ - it has 35mm edges / concaved 67mm spine (I think) and is 2'10 (mines a bit lighter than most but in the 2'11-2'12 region). So a slightly smaller edge / higher spine ie. 20-30mm / 70-80mm might be possible around 2'10-11. How big is the spine on a distinction?

mine is 75 or 76 mm I think, with edges that are either 22 or 29 mm depending whether youaccount for the rounded fce.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Canners

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5085
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • go hard or go home
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2012, 03:53:19 PM »


big edges, high spines and lower middles is my guess
Logged
I don't know how to put this, but, I'm kind of a big deal.

SkipperJ

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: so what are we going to see for new ranges
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2012, 05:22:56 PM »

I'm not sure whether we will see more of this, but I would like to see more Newbery Tour'esque profiles. People just don't seem to realize what they are really asking for when they ask for big edges. What they really want is a bat that will play well even for off-center shots. A convex profile would seem to be ideal for this.

Of course, fashion/fads can't necessarily be rationalized ...
Logged
CBF gave me BAD real bad!
(BAD = Bat Acquisition Disorder)
 

Advertise on CBF