Custom Bats Cricket Forum

Forum News and Suggestions => Custom Bats Blog => Topic started by: The 22nd Yard on March 29, 2013, 09:08:45 PM

Title: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 29, 2013, 09:08:45 PM
Update on Graeme Swann's injury...

http://blog.custombats.co.uk/2013/03/29/swann-looks-to-play-as-long-as-embury/ (http://blog.custombats.co.uk/2013/03/29/swann-looks-to-play-as-long-as-embury/)

What is your say on Swann, how many more years should he play for England?
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: uknsaunders on March 29, 2013, 09:13:20 PM
Since monty wasn't ripping through the NZ order, we need Swanny back asap.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Chad on March 29, 2013, 09:32:38 PM
As long as he can keep doing his job I guess. I think that he was a major reason as to why England didn't perform in the NZ series, and England should try keep him for as long as they can!
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Danny1870 on March 29, 2013, 09:40:50 PM
swanny would undoubtedly strengthen most sides in world cricket, so to have him back fit for the ashes both home and away will be a massive advantage for us.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 29, 2013, 10:23:05 PM
I have a feeling I may receive some stick for writing this post before he headed to America for the operation then :/

http://blog.custombats.co.uk/2013/03/07/is-swann-really-all-that-oh-and-england-players-arent-paid-enough/ (http://blog.custombats.co.uk/2013/03/07/is-swann-really-all-that-oh-and-england-players-arent-paid-enough/)

He's obviously a truly class player, a influential player for any side. But beyond this Ashes double header, I struggle to see him realistically fighting off the younger generation.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: joeljonno on March 29, 2013, 11:04:01 PM
I think he's got a while in the test arena, perhaps not much in the one dayers. Probably 2 good years before the young ones will be ready.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 29, 2013, 11:12:13 PM
I think he's got a while in the test arena, perhaps not much in the one dayers. Probably 2 good years before the young ones will be ready.

Seems fair, I think that 2013/14 will most definitely be his last Ashes though and probably 2015 his last World Cup. Then it becomes the point where 'you should leave while your still wanted, not because your not wanted'
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Rustyc30 on March 30, 2013, 01:59:04 AM
You never wish anyone to get injured but now that his is he should take his time to come back no need to rush back for the ashes. Then it might be a fare comparison of spinners we have Lyon on the park England have swann in the stands.  Yep its even then :)
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 01:11:52 PM
You never wish anyone to get injured but now that his is he should take his time to come back no need to rush back for the ashes. Then it might be a fare comparison of spinners we have Lyon on the park England have swann in the stands.  Yep its even then :)

Panesar vs Lyon would be a fairer battle
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 30, 2013, 01:16:21 PM
Lyon vs the average County second teamer?
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 01:24:10 PM
Lyon vs the average County second teamer?

Yep, not like Lyon will be any better on English pitches!

Panesar may be poor, and don't get me wrong I am not a Panesar fan in any way, but Flower obviously backs him to be his second choice, and I am a big Flower fan, so he must be doing something right!
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 30, 2013, 01:28:32 PM
Panesar may be poor, and don't get me wrong I am not a Panesar fan in any way, but Flower obviously backs him to be his second choice, and I am a big Flower fan, so he must be doing something right!

Panesar is what can loosely be termed a horses for courses selection - Swann is very much England's number one spinner and will remain so pretty much as long as he is able to get his arm around.  Meanwhile, whatever you make think of Panesar, he has a good level of international experience and a reasonably calm head on his (bowling) shoulders - so in the circumstances where he is likely to play you either have:
1. a solid spinner on a raging turner who, crucially, turns it the opposite way to Swann and at a very different pace and tajectory or...
2. a guy who can reasonably be expected to block up an end as the team workhorse.

Now, where Swann not on teh scene, you'd need to consider other variables, such as their ability to take wickets on intermediate pitches, their wider contribution etc, in which case you may well choose someone other than Monty...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 01:32:05 PM
Now, where Swann not on teh scene, you'd need to consider other variables, such as their ability to take wickets on intermediate pitches, their wider contribution etc, in which case you may well choose someone other than Monty...

Especially against Australia, who have to ability to play mainly left-handed batsmen and we all know Monty sometimes struggle against left-handers. That's why I think Borthwick should get a serious shout, being an English leg spinner who's fairly good is very rare.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: petehosk on March 30, 2013, 01:40:57 PM
Monty has shown that he's quality in some conditions. But not sure I rate Monty that highly on English wickets!
I prefer Treadwell in English conditions with Root as a backup with KP bowling the occasional couple of overs if need be.

Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 02:06:29 PM
If just Warne was 10 years younger, a Swann vs Warne series would be a very interesting watch.

If the Aussie's are bold they could throw youngster Ashton Agar into the fold, a lanky left-armer that could use the variable bounce and with his height wouldn't depend on big spinning pitches to get wickets. Would be a very very bold choice though.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 30, 2013, 05:32:24 PM
Especially against Australia, who have to ability to play mainly left-handed batsmen and we all know Monty sometimes struggle against left-handers. That's why I think Borthwick should get a serious shout, being an English leg spinner who's fairly good is very rare.

'cept he isn't really all that good - he's a decent bat, great fielder, but his spin is a work in progress still.  Its well known that I rate Adil Rashid in this regard, but I wouldn't call him up right now without some first class form, and its probably a year soon for Azeem Rafiq and Simon Kerrigan...so if Swann is out, I suspect it'll be Tredwell.  Now Tredders is a bit of a plodder, but he's miles better than Lyon...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 06:04:47 PM
'cept he isn't really all that good - he's a decent bat, great fielder, but his spin is a work in progress still.  Its well known that I rate Adil Rashid in this regard, but I wouldn't call him up right now without some first class form, and its probably a year soon for Azeem Rafiq and Simon Kerrigan...so if Swann is out, I suspect it'll be Tredwell.  Now Tredders is a bit of a plodder, but he's miles better than Lyon...

He's still a fair bowler I think, leg-spin does take time.

If Tredwell can maintain his form he currently has in One-Dayers he will be miles ahead of Lyon. It's strange with Aussie spinners, because I'd have thought the generation Warne had inspired would be coming through about now...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: procricket on March 30, 2013, 06:14:03 PM
'cept he isn't really all that good - he's a decent bat, great fielder, but his spin is a work in progress still.  Its well known that I rate Adil Rashid in this regard, but I wouldn't call him up right now without some first class form, and its probably a year soon for Azeem Rafiq and Simon Kerrigan...so if Swann is out, I suspect it'll be Tredwell.  Now Tredders is a bit of a plodder, but he's miles better than Lyon...


Borthwick has more control and takes wickets the cent he isn't very good he the best leg spinner in the country if you ask me..

Rashid is very average with the ball yes he can bat but he not a great or even a half decent leg spinner.

Take your Yorkshire tinted glasses off he took 16 wickets last season all season.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: joeljonno on March 30, 2013, 06:36:32 PM
To say he's not half-decent is a bit harsh, but he's definitely gone backwards since being in the England setup. Rafiq is a much better prospect as a player and a captain.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 06:40:43 PM
To say he's not half-decent is a bit harsh, but he's definitely gone backwards since being in the England setup. Rafiq is a much better prospect as a player and a captain.

Just hope Rafiq doesn't progress as Rashid did... or didn't
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: joeljonno on March 30, 2013, 06:42:24 PM
Just hope Rafiq doesn't progress as Rashid did... or didn't

Rafiq is T20 captain I think, so he's already surpassed him in that regard.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 30, 2013, 08:55:55 PM
Rafiq is T20 captain I think, so he's already surpassed him in that regard.

True, but just because they trust him with the captaincy doesn't necessarily mean his potential will be fulfilled. I hope for England's sake it is!
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 31, 2013, 06:09:21 AM
Borthwick has more control and takes wickets the cent he isn't very good he the best leg spinner in the country if you ask me..

Rashid is very average with the ball yes he can bat but he not a great or even a half decent leg spinner.

Take your Yorkshire tinted glasses off he took 16 wickets last season all season.

Shame that the facts don't back up your pithy attempted put downs....if you'd bothered to check, you might have noted that Borthwick only took 15!!!!!

Borthwick's career record shows 76 wickets at 30 but the fact that he has taken them over 42 games with only a solitary five wicket haul; compare that to Rashid's 296 wickets in 99 (eight of which were as a specialist batsman due to a shoulder injury) and 16 five wicket hauls, along with the fact that he has been the highest wicket taking spinner in the country twice in the past few years (indeed, he has taken more wickets in a single season that Borthwick has in his entire career).  You believe Borthwick to have more control, yet Rashid is consistently more economical throughout his career - indeed, he was also used as an opening bowler during the Big Bash, which is hardly a sign of a kid who can't land 'em.    On top of that, Rashid averages almost 8 higher with the bat and is one of the best fielders in the country. 

Yes, he had a bad year last year - though better than Borthwick - but the evidence so far suggests that it would be a criminal waste of talent to sideline him on that basis.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: procricket on March 31, 2013, 06:33:11 AM
Shame that the facts don't back up your pithy attempted put downs....if you'd bothered to check, you might have noted that Borthwick only took 15!!!!!

Borthwick's career record shows 76 wickets at 30 but the fact that he has taken them over 42 games with only a solitary five wicket haul; compare that to Rashid's 296 wickets in 99 (eight of which were as a specialist batsman due to a shoulder injury) and 16 five wicket hauls, along with the fact that he has been the highest wicket taking spinner in the country twice in the past few years (indeed, he has taken more wickets in a single season that Borthwick has in his entire career).  You believe Borthwick to have more control, yet Rashid is consistently more economical throughout his career - indeed, he was also used as an opening bowler during the Big Bash, which is hardly a sign of a kid who can't land 'em.    On top of that, Rashid averages almost 8 higher with the bat and is one of the best fielders in the country. 

Yes, he had a bad year last year - though better than Borthwick - but the evidence so far suggests that it would be a criminal waste of talent to sideline him on that basis.


Only half the story if your working off facts look at strike rates and averages it tells another story though doesn't it.


Love you only mention the stats in your favour.....

If he played as a batsman 120 runs in 20 innings is hardly a batsman is it look at rashid strike rate look at rashid average.........

2 sides of a coin I suggest people use both in..

For me it all about strike rate and borthwick takes 10 less deliverys to take his wickets in the longer form and not much in it.

Neither would get in any England side infant I doubt rashid will get in your beloved Yorkshire side.

There both average at the minue
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 31, 2013, 09:12:43 AM
Only half the story if your working off facts look at strike rates and averages it tells another story though doesn't it.

Not really - strike rate is, in my opinion a far lesser stat in looking at the long term worth of a bowler - after all, there are numerous factors that can distort the picture provided (one of the two bowlers playing eight games a season on the roads of Headingley and Scarborough, for example).  The simple fact is, over a period of time Rashid has played at a higher level, taken more wickets, scored more runs, made more tons and taken more fiverfers. 
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: ProCricketer1982 on March 31, 2013, 09:18:48 AM
How about neither is actually 'good enough' to replace an ageing and injured Swann?? Just because you happen to be the 'best of the rest' doesn't make you good enough. I don't watch either week in week out so you guys who support their counties probably see more of them but from what I have seen of both neither look much better than Lyon.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 31, 2013, 09:26:35 AM
How about neither is actually 'good enough' to replace an ageing and injured Swann?? Just because you happen to be the 'best of the rest' doesn't make you good enough. I don't watch either week in week out so you guys who support their counties probably see more of them but from what I have seen of both neither look much better than Lyon.

Dude, there are guys in your third XI better than Lyon!  ;)
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: FattusCattus on March 31, 2013, 09:48:46 AM
I wonder if Rashid woul benefit from a change of county and a change of scene to get the best out of him.

It would be a shame for Yorks, but they seem to have lost faith in him, and many a player has rejuvenated their career at a diferent county.

I'm a big fan of his, and I can't help feeling he'd progress if he could be firstr choice spinner and bat at 7 in a different side.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 31, 2013, 09:56:44 AM
Sadly, you may be correct with that one - his problems stem back to his treatment by England two winters back, when he was basically carted around as a drinks waiter for six months whilst his action was remodelled, and his confidence seemed to be badly affected as a result.  The talent is still there, but he needs a vote of confidence.

As for Yorkshire, I don't think it is that they have lost faith in him per se, as much as that Rafiiq played alongside him on a couple of spinning decks and bowled beautifully.  Given both are excellent fielders and decent with the willow, when there was room for only one spinner Dilly lost out. 
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 31, 2013, 10:00:22 AM
I wonder if Rashid woul benefit from a change of county and a change of scene to get the best out of him.

It would be a shame for Yorks, but they seem to have lost faith in him, and many a player has rejuvenated their career at a diferent county.

I'm a big fan of his, and I can't help feeling he'd progress if he could be firstr choice spinner and bat at 7 in a different side.

Couldn't agree with this more.

Would be a huge shame to see all that potential go to waste, who knows, Swann didn't play a test for England until he was 29, 8 years after his first ODI and 10 years after his first-class debut. Rashid still has 4 years until he's 29 and that will have been 11 years after his first-class debut and 8 years since his ODI debut! I see a pattern emerging...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: FattusCattus on March 31, 2013, 10:02:07 AM
With the right cuddle from a good man-manager and an extended run with responsibility in a side, he could go great guns at say Derbys, Gloucs, Northants, Leics, Glammy and even my boys Middx.

I'd hate to see him fade away in Yorks 2nd XI - he won't get any better or regain his confidence unless he plays
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Alvaro on March 31, 2013, 10:14:17 AM
Lancashire? Spinning wicket and they could afford to feed him...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 31, 2013, 10:28:01 AM
He's in the opposite boat to the one James Harris was in earlier this year...

Will have to join a club that will pay him in pennies rather than thousands I feel. As you mention Leics, I'm sure a few good years there and a call up to Notts would be on the cards as soon as Swann takes a comfy spot across from Tufnell on A Question of Sport! Highly doubt he would sink that low though. (Rashid, not Swann)

I think he should take advantage of loans, which are being used a lot more by counties nowadays.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Alvaro on March 31, 2013, 10:35:59 AM
Loans is a good idea - but conversely a settled spinner is better than one constantly trying to prove themselves.

How about Ollie Rayner? He's quite tall...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: FattusCattus on March 31, 2013, 10:44:25 AM
Sink how low?  Arguably counties like Derby's and Middx have nearly as much to offer as Yorks. They are either winning titles or on the rise - nothing like playing in a winning team for confidence!
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on March 31, 2013, 10:47:29 AM
Sink how low?

Sink Leicestershire low...
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on March 31, 2013, 10:50:44 AM
With the right cuddle from a good man-manager and an extended run with responsibility in a side, he could go great guns at say Derbys, Gloucs, Northants, Leics, Glammy and even my boys Middx.

I'd hate to see him fade away in Yorks 2nd XI - he won't get any better or regain his confidence unless he plays

Oh, I suspect he'll start the season in the side or miss the first two games at the most - Root will be with England, Bairstow may well be too and Yorkshire's batting reserves are not the best, so I figure he, Rafiq, Bresnan and Pyrah will be four of six bowlers to bolster the batting.
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: The 22nd Yard on April 04, 2013, 01:27:44 PM
Oh, I suspect he'll start the season in the side or miss the first two games at the most - Root will be with England, Bairstow may well be too and Yorkshire's batting reserves are not the best, so I figure he, Rafiq, Bresnan and Pyrah will be four of six bowlers to bolster the batting.

Rashid starts and bats at 7 for Yorkshire against Leeds MCCU, with Rafiq at 6, looks like you were spot on!
Title: Re: Graeme Swann: Injury Update
Post by: Manormanic on April 04, 2013, 02:28:05 PM
Rashid starts and bats at 7 for Yorkshire against Leeds MCCU, with Rafiq at 6, looks like you were spot on!
Be surprised if they don't swap spots by the time it comes to the match itself.