Custom Bats Cricket Forum
General Cricket => Latest Matches => Topic started by: mattw on January 26, 2011, 02:43:42 AM
-
Who's watching this one?
-
England win the toss and bat. KP and Jimmy back in.
1 Andrew Strauss (capt), 2 Matt Prior (wk), 3 Jonathan Trott, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Ian Bell, 6 Eoin Morgan, 7 Paul Collingwood, 8 Michael Yardy, 9 Ajmal Shahzad, 10 Chris Tremlett, 11 James Anderson.
-
What an awesome game, i though clarke did us in but Johny hastings got us home, Good man.
-
are you talking about the 6th odi from yesterday?
it kind of shows what we think of Odi stuff here on this forum - the 4th game was the one we won and still there are no comments... the ashes mind - people were up all night watching it :o !
-
we won the ashes - stock answer to any ODI defeats....
-
What ODI series?
-
Were odis conceived as an international version of what people play every weekend? T20 seems to have evolved from midweek cricket, whatever the ecb say.... Is there room for 3 formats?
-
Were odis conceived as an international version of what people play every weekend? T20 seems to have evolved from midweek cricket, whatever the ecb say.... Is there room for 3 formats?
Without ODIs there would be less International exposure for up coming players. Guys like Morgan, Collingwood, Swann etc gained confidence from ODIs which brings added mental strength for Test cricket. ODIs give batsmen the chance to build an innings, which is vital if you're looking to play Test cricket.
T20s are just mindless slogging contests. Guys like Pollard, Warner look 'world class', yet are pretty crap in longer forms of cricket.
-
Like Jeet says, T20 was to bring in fans from other sports and make cricket more accessible.
I for one managed to convert a few mates by taking them up to Old Trafford after work for a few beers tto watch a Lancs game where I described it as "basically we get smashed in the sun whilst watching them smack it about for a couple of hours"
These lads now play cricket and text me at 4am asking if I have seen Swanny's latest video diary.
But ODI's are a good stepping stone for the big time, so to speak
-
ODIs give batsmen the chance to build an innings, which is vital if you're looking to play Test cricket.
Surely county/shield games are supposed to provide this platform?
-
Tim - I do agree with you - but you don't ger a full house for a county ground and the pressure to perform in front of a large crowd does test people's nerve.
-
Surely county/shield games are supposed to provide this platform?
But even in state/county cricket when do you ever see an attack featuring its International bowlers? Rarely ever. Playing domestic cricket is good, but facing guys like Lee, Tait, Akhtar, Gul etc is a different level altogether. In domestic cricket you could see of the speedster, in International cricket there would be no hiding place.
but you don't get a full house for a county ground and the pressure to perform in front of a large crowd does test people's nerve.
Very true as well Buzz, it's much tougher going out to bat in say Australia, India, SA etc where the crowd is baying for blood. Performing in those conditions shows a batsman's mental strength.
-
Just need less of the cricket as a prime example the 7 one day internationals in this series why can't we cut down the amount of cricket and make it more meaningful as a result
-
I agree with Rocco, 5 ODI's would be plenty. Watson and Clarke arent even playing in ODI7 on Sunday.
-
are you talking about the 6th odi from yesterday?
Yep my bad.
we won the ashes - stock answer to any ODI defeats....
Still means alot to us aussies who have to bear the shame of being beaten by the pomms in are own beer garden
Just need less of the cricket as a prime example the 7 one day internationals in this series why can't we cut down the amount of cricket and make it more meaningful as a result
The reason is MONEY, plain and simple, no other cricket contest in australia draws the crowds like Aus V england in any format, so the head honcho's are sucking every cent they can out of it. And thats why the shorter formats were created as well, to get people to the ground to watch cricket and spend they're money so so
-
correct me if im wrong but i think the ashes has to have 7 ODI's tagged on due to its "premium series" rating or something?
-
No 5 usually
-
5 ODIs would be enough I reckon!
After the warm up matches, Tests and T20 matches, is it any wonder England have 5/6 players injured!??
That kind of indicates that it is just too hard on the body to play that much cricket with little rest in between.
-
The perfect tour, IMO, would be 3 Tests, 3 ODIs and 3 T20s. But in the more historic series additional Tests could be added. After an epic 5 Test series, no one wants 7 ODIs.
-
After an epic 5 Test series, no one wants 7 ODIs.
the TV ratings and crowd attendence would prove the the opposite. You have to remember in Aus, 95% of the home crowd would be within 3 hours drive of the stadium. Its pretty unfair to deny a major city the chance to see an awesome match between Aus and UK, though 5 odi's would be better, you'd have to drop off a iconic match at either bellrieve, adelaide or the wacca.