Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]

Author Topic: England In Sri Lanka  (Read 30353 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #210 on: April 05, 2012, 04:54:12 PM »

Just to add how refreshing to see the Umpires give a full and frank explanation of what was discussed and their interpretation of today's events. Football should take note as so often do refs disappear lol also no hotspot is a bigger issue for me, it should all be the same or not at all.
Logged

Lions Pride

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #211 on: April 05, 2012, 09:59:50 PM »

If you were batting and a bowler who had been bowling right-arm over for a few overs suddenly decided he would run in and bowl left-arm over (without telling you or the umpire) which then bowled you I'm sure you wouldn't be happy. It's exactly the same with the switch-hit, if you take stance as a right hander you shouldn't be able to decide half way through a bowler's delivery stride you want to take stance as a left hander.

The 'leg-spinners are allowed to bowl googlies' argument isn't valid either, there's nothing in the rule book that says a leg-spinner has to spin the ball away from a right handed batsman, whereas someone who says they're going to bowl right-arm over HAS to bowl right-arm over.
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #212 on: April 06, 2012, 06:55:55 AM »

If a person suddenly started bowling with other arm I'd say bring it on as more likely some pies thrown up

Nothing in the laws against switch hit just a directive so until mcc (the law makers) meet in may its fine kp was just doing it too early on the 1 occasion but other 2 occasions dilshan was in delivery stride so fault was his as per the mcc directive
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #213 on: April 06, 2012, 07:48:31 AM »

DRS is turning this game into a farce, it's embarrassing. 10 minutes for a descision and hotspot would've taken 10 seconds. I'm not surprised Dilshan is fuming
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #214 on: April 06, 2012, 07:59:31 AM »

Dilshan needs to vent frustration at his board then as they are the ones who won't pay for it

If they can't afford it fair enough but I agree with commentators either use all drs tools or none of it

Plus I think icc should fund it not the host boards
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

charlie15

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 826
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Can't bat, can't bowl, but love the game
    • W&HCC
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #215 on: April 06, 2012, 05:50:11 PM »

I think the ICC needs to take the lead on this one.  There needs to be a vote by the test play AND associate nations on whether DRS should be allowed in all formats of the game.  The ICC will then have to pay for it.  Trouble is as long as India don't want DRS the ICC won't do anything about it.
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #216 on: April 07, 2012, 09:08:14 AM »

Top finish from kp little harsh leaving cook on 49* but team first and he really wanted to smash dilshan
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

johnnyw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2058
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #217 on: April 07, 2012, 09:12:02 AM »

Is it 11 or 12 wins now for Bresnan?
Logged

legger123

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #218 on: April 07, 2012, 09:13:06 AM »

11 now!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]
 

Advertise on CBF