Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Australia - Who should be in there side?  (Read 3124 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Colesy

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7677
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • I hate losing more than I even wanna win.
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #15 on: December 31, 2010, 02:43:44 AM »

after much consideration, i think only Hussey can retain his place. They've got to make changes so id probably go for something like this...

1. K Minogue
2. R Harris (Rolf not Ryan)
3. Stingray (of Neighbours fame)
4. M Hussey
5. O Newton-John
6. M Gibson (when fit)
7. R Murdoch
8. E Goolagong
9. L Hewitt
10. Fosters Advert Guy # 1 (potent new ball combination with...)
11. Fosters Advert Guy # 2

Tim Minchin is pushing for a place, as is Harry Kewell
Logged
High scores: 255, 124, 114              Best figures: 5-19, 5-24, 5-26

tugga_5

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #16 on: December 31, 2010, 09:19:57 AM »

Tim Minchin is pushing for a place, as is Harry Kewell
Surely Danni Minogue should be up for a bit of consideration?
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #17 on: December 31, 2010, 12:27:18 PM »

Surely Danni Minogue should be up for a bit of consideration?
I see that N imbruglia and J Donovan have also missed the cut. I believe the latter would be great in the slips given his habits...
Logged

will5210

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 533
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • See the ball, hit the ball
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2010, 12:41:05 PM »

after much consideration, i think only Hussey can retain his place. They've got to make changes so id probably go for something like this...

1. K Minogue
2. R Harris (Rolf not Ryan)
3. Stingray (of Neighbours fame)
4. M Hussey
5. O Newton-John
6. M Gibson (when fit)
7. R Murdoch
8. E Goolagong
9. L Hewitt
10. Fosters Advert Guy # 1 (potent new ball combination with...)
11. Fosters Advert Guy # 2

If you were going for a hilarious, unrealistic team, Phil Hughes should be in lol!

Colesy

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7677
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • I hate losing more than I even wanna win.
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #19 on: December 31, 2010, 01:26:27 PM »

Surely Danni Minogue should be up for a bit of consideration?

She's physio. mmmmmm
Logged
High scores: 255, 124, 114              Best figures: 5-19, 5-24, 5-26

Mr Cricket

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2106
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #20 on: January 01, 2011, 11:45:48 AM »

If Mel Gibson is not fit, id have Jason Donovan in the side, to open the batting with K. Minogue to reform their excellent partnership (
) this would mean Rolf Harris going down to number 6, which would be a definite sign that his days in the side are numbered.

D. Minogue should be appointed physio with a clause in her contract that meant she had to wear whatever uniform the team manager felt suitable.

Re: Phil Hughes, "g'day its Cricket Australia here, cheers for letting us know your available phil... don't worry, we've got your number, we'll call you... dont call us!"
Logged

Mortimer

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 400
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #21 on: January 01, 2011, 02:39:17 PM »

after much consideration, i think only Hussey can retain his place. They've got to make changes so id probably go for something like this...

1. K Minogue
2. R Harris (Rolf not Ryan)
3. Stingray (of Neighbours fame)
4. M Hussey
5. O Newton-John
6. M Gibson (when fit)
7. R Murdoch
8. E Goolagong
9. L Hewitt
10. Fosters Advert Guy # 1 (potent new ball combination with...)
11. Fosters Advert Guy # 2

No place for skippy the bush kangaroo?
Logged

awp

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 549
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2011, 10:45:09 AM »

Some good suggestions here.......no Russell Crowe? would be handy up front with the gladiator sword and leather kit!

The test team MUST be as follows;

Watson - Has good technique, keeps getting out at 50 but is that a huge problem?
Payne - has very good technique and has ability against new ball, must play, leader
Kwaja - showed he's got talent and the head for test cricket
Ponting - he's not the 2005 model but still in the best 6 in the country, will perform again
Hussey - never write off Mr Cricket........ever!
Clarke - good on flat tracks, last chance mate at 6.....captain? no way
Haddin - best batting keeper in the world
Johnson - on thin ice but is a match winner when on
Hauritz - still the best spinner we got
Siddle - whole hearted tryer and goodish test bowler
Bollinger - not fit this summer but in the best 3 pace bowlers in the country

Notes;
Hughes - heavily backed by Langer but hasn't got sufficient technique for test cricket
Clarke - better perform @ 6, S Marsh, C Ferguson, C White all ready willing and able
Katich - hard nosed pro.....achillies injuries are serious at 35
Hilfenhaus - please watch video of Alderman and PITCH IT UP!
Smith - good lad, good all round cricketer, freak 1 day ability, not a test cricketer
Ponting & Hussey both 35 in time will be replaced by either of the 3 mentioned above
Beer - looks good (always!)
Harris - should put heat on the 3 pace bowlers selected and possibly replace them if fit
General Shout - to anyone that can anyone bowl fast?
McDonald - who ever suggested him - give yourself a wedgie!

Further;
Congrats to England, out played us all over the park, they look and play like an Australian team now and have capacity to be no.1 for a few years whilst Australia recover and assume their rightful position.

Cook - was a laughing stock last time, shows good toughness to do what he did
Pietersen - still a goose, 1 great score, the rest was lame
Bell - we knew he was a great lad, very pleased to see him realise his potential
Collingwood - well done on your career, certainly got the most from limited ability, test avg of 40 is excellent
Tremlette - if thats a Tremlette, how big exactly is a Tremel
Morgan - will lift the side to greater heights ala Gillchrist type innings'

whadayarecon?


« Last Edit: January 11, 2011, 10:55:44 AM by awp »
Logged

Canners

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5085
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • go hard or go home
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2011, 10:57:10 AM »

Australia squad for first ODI against England on 16 January
M Clarke (captain), C White (vice-captain), D Bollinger, X Doherty, B Haddin, N Hauritz, D Hussey, M Hussey, M Johnson, B Lee, P Siddle, S Smith, S Tait, S Watson.


im happy to see the inclusion of Lee and Tait as i think it should be a more entertaining viewing against our openers although i still dont know why nannes isnt getting a shot he's rapid......
Logged
I don't know how to put this, but, I'm kind of a big deal.

tbarnfield99

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1494
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #24 on: January 11, 2011, 11:02:28 AM »

Callum Ferguson is entitled for a shout after overcoming his recent injuries. His record really does speak for himself, and scores run a ball at ODI level.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/player/5236.html
Logged
TLB

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #25 on: January 11, 2011, 11:13:20 AM »

lovely - apart from Tait and a late burst from Lee I don't see much menace in that attack. Knowing the Aussie selectors, they'll pick their worst 11 anyway...
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

Jeet

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2011, 12:06:04 PM »

Good to see Hauritz back. Doherty is village.

Where the hell is Shaun Marsh? More logical to select Marsh over the aging David Hussey.
Logged
"Commit all your crimes when Sachin is batting", "They will go unnoticed because even the Lord is watching".

espocrespo

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1606
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #27 on: January 11, 2011, 02:40:05 PM »

Logged

Mortimer

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 400
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2011, 07:50:42 PM »

Some good suggestions here.......no Russell Crowe? would be handy up front with the gladiator sword and leather kit!

Slight problem is that he is a Kiwi rather than a convict!
Logged

awp

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 549
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia - Who should be in there side?
« Reply #29 on: January 16, 2011, 12:06:38 PM »

Slight problem is that he is a Kiwi rather than a convict!

You tell him that!  he's as Australian as Strauss, Trott, Pietersen and Morgan are English :)
« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 12:22:02 PM by awp »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF