Advertise on CBF

Poll

Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?

Sri Lanka
Pakistan
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?  (Read 3601 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

jonpinson

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2916
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2011, 08:16:58 PM »
Quote from: Colesy on March 19, 2011, 08:14:52 PM
+ giving me your beloved pro bat :P

Which one? :D
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2011, 08:17:05 PM »
Mullally mate remember him he got his chance....
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

jonpinson

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2916
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2011, 08:19:11 PM »
Quote from: procricket on March 19, 2011, 08:15:53 PM
No rampage mate Jon

I have to ask though you and Mike seem to post at similar times are you his scizo phrenic (sp) alto ego

There no rampage here mate i agree with Tumo there better coming through players

No Dave, just for you, I'm not Mike, Mike isn't me and we are not (yet) lovers.

In regard to the rampage comment, I will reserve judgement until the morning when I have surveyed the potential carnage :D
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2011, 08:20:45 PM »
fair enough bud

I have just read how Alan Mullally was once 2nd in the world in odi cricket at one stage

Man batsman must have been poor
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2011, 08:50:33 PM »
I don't know what everyone is worried about we are the only side through not to have lost to a team that has qualified so bring them on
« Last Edit: March 19, 2011, 08:58:30 PM by roco »
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2011, 08:56:47 PM »
Quote from: procricket on March 19, 2011, 08:12:07 PM
and is a better batter than all you mention

He lacked a yard of pace apparently

I have no doubt his ship has long saled mate but ask around a lot of international players rated him

Did you not see the time he ripped Essex apart in the B and h Cup final i think he took 6-17 at Lords in a final and still not selected.

His record for England A and U19 is outstanding but the ship has been sunk unfortunalty

he's a bit ginger...
Logged

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2011, 09:00:59 PM »
both SL and Pak are slippery customers, i reckon England would prefer Pak more than SL.
Logged

golders

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 2056
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2011, 09:09:38 PM »
Quote from: 100 not out on March 19, 2011, 09:00:59 PM
both SL and Pak are slippery customers, i reckon England would prefer Pak more than SL.

Quite a few Pakistani's are slippery customers: Salim Malik, Shoaib Akhtar, Salman Butt, Asif, that dodgy agent dude.

Controversial...
Logged

Tumo

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1721
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2011, 09:13:39 PM »
Quote from: golders on March 19, 2011, 09:09:38 PM
Quite a few Pakistani's are slippery customers: Salim Malik, Shoaib Akhtar, Salman Butt, Asif, that dodgy agent dude.

Controversial...

Awwwwkward....
Logged

golders

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 2056
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2011, 09:27:39 PM »
Logged

Tumo

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1721
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #25 on: March 19, 2011, 09:35:36 PM »
Quote from: golders on March 19, 2011, 09:27:39 PM
Sorry.....
I enjoyed it personally, bit of banter!
Logged

golders

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 2056
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Who Would you rather have for the quarter finals?
« Reply #26 on: March 19, 2011, 09:36:34 PM »
But I was being abolutely serious. Now THAT'S awkward...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF