Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Fat Bats  (Read 9099 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2011, 03:02:51 PM »
Does Redback pay?
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2011, 03:04:46 PM »
I don't think Gary advertises though
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2011, 03:07:54 PM »
Does he not make business out of the forum. If he doesn't fair enough.
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #18 on: April 14, 2011, 03:11:23 PM »
By word of mouth he does but never comes on to advertise only sometimes to answer questions and show photos of players but I may be wrong
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

jonpinson

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2916
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #19 on: April 14, 2011, 03:12:56 PM »
If Salix have to pay:

By the same token you could argue GN should pay up because Alex came on here and dared to post some pics of the workshop.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #20 on: April 14, 2011, 03:16:42 PM »
I pointed something out

I think the powers that be will decide.
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #21 on: April 14, 2011, 03:17:01 PM »
Well I for one will leave this to the forum owner to decide as this could go down a slippery slope
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2002
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #22 on: April 14, 2011, 03:17:05 PM »
Word of mouth is very similar to the brand itself adertising and can often be more effective, because it's other people who are plugging the product, not the maker/owner.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2011, 03:20:04 PM by langer17 »
Logged

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2002
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #23 on: April 14, 2011, 03:17:33 PM »
It may not be 100% fair, but you can't controll word of mouth and there is nothing wrong with it in my opinion.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2011, 03:19:29 PM by langer17 »
Logged

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #24 on: April 14, 2011, 03:23:22 PM »
Gary's username is advertising for him, if he post any where on forums people will read Redback Cricket and a new comer who is not sure will get an idea and will later look up for it.
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #25 on: April 14, 2011, 03:23:55 PM »
Quote from: roco on April 14, 2011, 03:17:01 PM
Well I for one will leave this to the forum owner to decide as this could go down a slippery slope
agreed

Lisa could you get some pictures up of the profiles on the forum please
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #26 on: April 14, 2011, 03:27:58 PM »
if this forum is a means of income generation, then . . . . .

make up your own mind . . . .

none of my business really.
Logged

jonpinson

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2916
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #27 on: April 14, 2011, 03:29:31 PM »
I think the admin team are capable of making their own decisions.
Logged

Opener

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 399
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #28 on: April 14, 2011, 03:34:41 PM »
From my vantage it seems unfair. I think the mods/admins need to clarify a bit why they were banned. Specially, if they intended to be sponsors once they learnt about the rules.

Is it different if the owners post about a brand or if a third party does. I remember not too long ago someone posted about Vindico Cricket which was a similar post although the owner did not get involved.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Fat Bats
« Reply #29 on: April 14, 2011, 03:37:25 PM »
Time this was closed i think it meant to be about FAT BATS.....

Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF