But surely a trigger isn't changing anything at all it's just giving the "shuffle" a different name!
I understand it from CD's perspective, there's a video of me in the youtube thread with an open stance and a trigger where i basically take a step down the pitch.
I then closed off my stance a bit and have nearly got rid of the trigger and for the first net it felt really weird not doing the trigger but only for one net then it was pretty much normal
yip, it's the same thing. his problem was never the fact that he had a trigger, it was the his balance. michael vaughn, ricky ponting, jacques kallis, ab de villiers, all these guys have triggers and don't have many issues with balance. it is however how you execute the trigger that matters most. he could have the same problem with balance without a trigger as well. i am sure that Buzz would agree with me when i say that often, from a coaching perspective, more than one solution to a specific problem can be found and that identifying the solution that is more suitable to the player and would be integrated more easily is often the best way to go. i am simply suggesting that doing something that he might feel more comfortable with might yield quicker results as opposed to something completely different.
Either way, the forum has done it's job, it has provided CD with a number of possible solutions to his issues and it's up to him now to decide how to implement these.