Topic: England V West Indies (Read 5511 times)

Outlaw · « **Reply #30 on:** February 08, 2009, 11:24:22 AM »

Wouldn't bet on the ECB giving the right man the job, why wasn't Tom Moody even spoken to before appointing Moores? He was the man for the job, now he's happy in Australia and wants to raise his kids there so there's not a prayer of getting him. I think Graeme Ford is the man for the job.

bucko2007 · « **Reply #31 on:** February 08, 2009, 11:51:57 AM »

Quote from: umar on February 07, 2009, 08:59:13 PM

People keep saying that Bell and cook are the ones to be left out, but what about Collingwood??

I couldn't agree more... I do not understand why Shah and Bopara are overlooked... Why would u have collingwood instead of shah?

Outlaw · « **Reply #32 on:** February 08, 2009, 11:52:41 AM »

The England dressing room is like the old boys club that's why..

Chaim · « **Reply #33 on:** February 08, 2009, 01:01:28 PM »

Shah in for colly let bell drop down to 5 (he seems much more comfortable there)

Swanny in for Monty (monty lacks variation and killer instinct)(he should really take a leaf out of Sulie Benns book)

ANderson must play next game but I wont be surprised if Harmison is favoured for the Oval test

2 spinners playing at queens park is a thought but time will tell

Author Topic: England V West Indies (Read 5511 times)

Outlaw

Re: England V West Indies

bucko2007

Re: England V West Indies

Outlaw

Re: England V West Indies

Chaim

Re: England V West Indies