Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: M+H Original Low Bat  (Read 2185 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
M+H Original Low Bat
« on: February 10, 2012, 09:59:27 PM »

Just wondering why these are so much cheaper than all other M+H bats? As far as I am aware they are G1?
Logged

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2012, 10:00:12 PM »

or G3, depending on which one you go for (I think)
Logged

gabbers

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 202
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2012, 10:00:35 PM »

I thought they were g2?
Logged

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2012, 10:02:39 PM »

Ah perhaps, they do them in normal and mark ii, not so sure why the massive different in price though.
Logged

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2012, 10:06:23 PM »

I would assume they are lower grade 1? maybe weighing a bit heavy or something? Denser wood? They seem like a bit of a bargain?
Logged

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2012, 12:12:00 PM »

any one else care to shed some light on this?
Logged

kaustav

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1087
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Excuse me for requesting your pardon: I am drunk
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2012, 12:14:18 PM »

any one else care to shed some light on this?


I hope this helps.

Logged
In Water I trust!!

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2012, 12:17:08 PM »

Thanks a lot clearer now.
Logged

Blazer

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 996
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Team Anti - Concave !.
Re: M+H Original Low Bat
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2012, 12:43:15 PM »

The distinction and amplus are made from "oversized clefts ",So these could be normal cleft.
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF