Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?  (Read 10295 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9707
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #15 on: March 10, 2012, 02:23:25 PM »
I have Ayrtek softs and they a excellent. I hate stiff gloves, and Tom's design allows for great flexibility, which in turn allows you to boff the ball harder.

They are perfect for proper batsmen, such as myself.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2012, 04:46:12 PM by FattusCattus »
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #16 on: March 10, 2012, 02:24:32 PM »
A Brucie endorsement is all I'd need as no more a proper batsmen in the land
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9707
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #17 on: March 10, 2012, 02:40:11 PM »
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice!

I've even got a proper batsman's 'hurtie' on my inner thigh, courtesey of netting with the Hosk. It's a beauty!
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #18 on: March 10, 2012, 02:46:10 PM »
Guess it was revenge for the near a&e appointment I gave him haha
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Cumbrian Pete

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 316
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Wicket Keeper / Batsman
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2012, 02:54:24 PM »
Thanks for all the comments, folks, I'm sneaking towards the Ayrtek now...will check out the forum offers.

Roco...one comment I didn't understand was your wish for Tom to do pads in 'OSM', is this a size?
Logged

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14749
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2012, 02:57:07 PM »
Over Sized Men's...he's a tall lad at 6ft 3 and we did get a couple in for a pro we supply kit too.


Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #21 on: March 10, 2012, 03:04:10 PM »
Yeah when I realised I needed osm pads Tom had just sold the last pair to a county player so did not have anymore and at 6FT4 (Tom) I need bigger tall person pads
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9707
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2012, 03:07:31 PM »
Quote from: Ayrtek on March 10, 2012, 02:57:07 PM
Over Sized Men's...he's a tall lad at 6ft 3 and we did get a couple in for a pro we supply kit too.


He's not a lad - he's a freak of nature who lives in the woods, only coming out to knock off a quick 50, or to be photographed by American tourists!

Here he is shadow-batting, practising his forward defensive!
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2012, 03:10:02 PM »
We're not starting this again are we?

Very good though Bruce I tip my hat to you
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14749
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #24 on: March 10, 2012, 03:10:18 PM »
Hahaha top work Brucey!!

Pete how tall are you as unless ur towering over 6ft 4+ I'd think the standard men's will be ok for you. :)
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #25 on: March 10, 2012, 03:13:39 PM »
I'd say 6ft2 or below would be happy with them as I used mine last season just little gap between thigh guard and lad has them now is 5ft6 or 5ft8 and loves them
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #26 on: March 10, 2012, 03:35:18 PM »
Quote from: roco on March 10, 2012, 03:13:39 PM
I'd say 6ft2 or below would be happy with them as I used mine last season just little gap between thigh guard and lad has them now is 5ft6 or 5ft8 and loves them
I reckon it's more personal preference though, cos I'm 6'5" and use regular mens pads, and think they are fine!
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #27 on: March 10, 2012, 03:36:30 PM »
Yeah but I bet there is a gap between the top of pad and thigh guard which there should not be

So a choice of bigger thigh guards which I have or bigger pads
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #28 on: March 10, 2012, 03:40:54 PM »
No because I wear my thigh guards lower and use the hip protector of my aeros as extra thigh protection (I run and hide from anything short anyway lol)
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Ayrtek, Woodstock or Redback Gloves?
« Reply #29 on: March 10, 2012, 03:42:08 PM »
Ah I can't wear my thigh guards low plus anything short I think whoopee runs but does not always work haha
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF