I firmly believe in fair play and don't like teams who go out of their way to cheat or behave poorly on the pitch, one or two of my teammates don't agree but the majority will walk.
I'll always walk if I've nicked it behind, I've only ever had to walk twice in 10 years as we don't usually face anyone quick so I probably only get caught behind once or twice a season and it is usually a thick edge from a wild slog so pretty obvious
All of this got me thinking about a situation 3 seasons ago in a cup competition, the match had umpires provided. I was caught on the boundary at cow corner, I was already running back for a second so had my back to it but heard the cheers from the opposition so assumed the catch was taken, just as I was ready to walk off my batting partner and the umpire both said "he's carried the ball over the boundary", the umpire was very firm and said I was not out and told me not to walk off, so I stayed on as the umpire was adamant about it being correct.
I hadn't seen the catch so couldn't say if he had gone over the boudary or not, my question is this - should I have just walked as the scenario is in a way similar to nicking behind being given not out and then walking? I'll never know if the boundary catcher had stayed in bounds or not and the umpire could have been wrong.....
All I know is I got a log of grief from the opposition for the rest of my time at the crease.