Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Kruger Van Wyk  (Read 19585 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

potzy248

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1673
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Kruger Van Wyk
« on: August 23, 2012, 10:36:58 PM »

Surely Brendan McCullum must be told to put the gloves back on. Van Wyk cannot be our best keeper, its embarrassing!
Logged
Kane Williamson for Prime Minister.

nick123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 160
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2012, 05:28:45 AM »

Yeah man its sad as Van Wyk is not bad but not McCullum but who else do we have Watling,Derek de Boorder,Watling Young,Hopkins choose one or tell McCullum to bat at 5 or 6 and keep.
Logged
@nickbsaid

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2012, 06:50:36 AM »

Does New Zealand still play international cricket?  ;) :D
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2012, 08:30:05 AM »

As I said on another thread, McCullum is a world class keeper-batsman but a relatively limited selection as a pure batsman.

I wonder whether they will go to Ronchi as soona s he is qualified.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

nick123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 160
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2012, 09:27:09 AM »

As I said on another thread, McCullum is a world class keeper-batsman but a relatively limited selection as a pure batsman.
Yes we do Just poorly man

I wonder whether they will go to Ronchi as soon s he is qualified.
He is tearing it up in the plunket shield for wellington so I think yes
Logged
@nickbsaid

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2012, 09:28:31 AM »

He is tearing it up in the plunket shield for wellington so I think yes

Will be a good pick up for them, he always looked a good quality player int eh Sheffield Shield...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

nick123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 160
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2012, 09:31:44 AM »

Yeah good find came over late last season , Wellington as a whole are performing better than the last couple of years with Woakes ,Ryder and Ronchi leading them they are now a better team.
Logged
@nickbsaid

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2012, 09:51:48 AM »

Southee and Gareth Andrews both having decent matches at the moment, anyone know why Woakes isn't playing, hope he's not injured again.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

nick123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 160
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2012, 08:49:23 PM »

Not sure mate he played on the 7th vs cd , would think he would be player vs ND which started yesterday
Logged
@nickbsaid

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2012, 08:57:39 PM »

How far off is Ryder to playing in the England series?
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #10 on: December 17, 2012, 08:58:35 PM »

Ronchi is very decent indeed I rate him a lot seen him a few times good operator
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2012, 09:01:50 PM »

Ronchi is very decent indeed I rate him a lot seen him a few times good operator

What will the reaction be from the Aussies? Or wasn't he quite good enough anyway to hold down a regular place?
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2012, 09:04:18 PM »

He did well when called apron in odi for Australia

Think he like prior his keeping needs work to be at the top level

Better keeper than haddin in my,opinion just not,as,good as,wade,

For me Hartley is the best keeper in Australia

Ronchi is a,class,act hope he gets a go
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

nick123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 160
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2012, 02:31:54 AM »




How far off is Ryder to playing in the England series?

I think Ryder will make his int comeback vs england and ronchi who is eligable for NZ in January and i think he is in for test matches not sure about the shorter forms of the game .
Logged
@nickbsaid

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Kruger Van Wyk
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2012, 08:06:12 AM »

What will the reaction be from the Aussies? Or wasn't he quite good enough anyway to hold down a regular place?

he was sort of floating around the back of the list of candidates to shadow Haddin, but then Paine and Wade came on the scene and he realised he was not going to make it...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"
Pages: [1] 2
 

Advertise on CBF