Worcs v Warks
Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Worcs v Warks  (Read 1830 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Worcs v Warks
« on: September 04, 2012, 11:47:03 AM »
I know I wouldn't want to be playing for Worcs right now. 60ao off 28.4 isn't too impressive...
Logged

legger123

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2012, 11:51:28 AM »
With batsmen 3,4,5,6 making 5 runs! Shocking!
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2012, 11:54:18 AM »
spineless capitulation or appaling wicket?

they chose to bat, after all...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 5409
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2012, 12:02:04 PM »
Their batting's been totally reliant on Hughes and Ali all season, with the occasional knock from Mitchell or Solanki. With Solanki offski over the winter and their only decent bowler being 37 things don't look too healthy down new Road way these days.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

Tom

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Trade Count: (+33)
    • www.cricketinsight.co.uk
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2012, 12:23:11 PM »
Ali has averaged 23 this season. The highest average excluding overseas players, is Mitchell at 27. Very poor!
Logged

Vantage_Cricket

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 774
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2012, 12:34:09 PM »
Indeed,

Worcs have been out of their depth this season. Lots of young players there though - they have over achieved in the past couple of seasons I think anyway with getting promoted and then staying up.

Doesn't help when they've had to make a massive un-scheduled payments over the past couple of season in sorting their ground due to the floods. In which they haven't been able to get any great calibre of players.
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2012, 01:33:08 PM »
And Warks equal the Worcs score with the loss of no wickets inside 20 overs... Not a demon track then!
Logged

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14749
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2012, 02:38:43 PM »
£50k a pop when it floods bumper told me when i went up! cant insure against it either....quite a hit to take when it happens in the county game
Logged

Vantage_Cricket

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 774
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2012, 02:51:45 PM »
I believe it was over £1m when it flooded very badly a couple of years back as well. Since then they haven't been able to sign many exciting players and are relying on the youth set up greatly at the moment
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2012, 05:52:48 PM »
you wish them well though, for all the water issues the game would be a worse place without a cold beer on a hot day at the county ground!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

19reading87

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 7079
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2012, 01:00:47 PM »
You beeeaaaarrrrrrrs!!!!
Logged
Highest score: 147*          Best bowling: 6-20

Vantage_Cricket

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 774
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Worcs v Warks
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2012, 01:11:14 PM »
Quote from: 19reading87 on September 06, 2012, 01:00:47 PM
You beeeaaaarrrrrrrs!!!!

:(
Disappointing for the pears not to put more of a fight. Division 2 here we come!
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF