May I ask, at the risk of being yelled at and put in my place, why oh why are ppl complaining about the pitch...If you are playing at the top most level then you are supposed to be able to bat on any pitch and make runs, similarly take wickets. When India tour Eng and get blown out of the park the normal stance is "well you should be able to play swing and seam, T-20 (IPL) is ruining cricket",,,along the same lines should england not be able to play and bowl spin??now I agree this pitch is a shame for test cricket but common I don't think WI greats would worried too much about the pitch or Mcgrath would have grumbled...they knew how to take wickets...prob is most teams today are one dimensional i.e. they perform well when conditions suit them and struggle against even small adversities...If Eng had won the toss, played 2 spinners and add KP as part timer managing to win the match then the pitch would have been "Okay"Also most nations tailor their pitches to their teams needsEng is seaming/swinging, SA has bounce, Aus used to be fast, India has always been a dustbowl, spinning tracks so why so much surprise!!
Agree with you on this. India can't win in swinging conditions and England can't win on spinning tracks. Apart from south africa and australia all test playing nations are one dimensional.
I agree. Surely this pitch hasn't come as a shock to anyone in the England set-up?
given that neither aus or SA have a spinner of note, I would say they are pretty one dimensional. the Saffas have the advantage due to having Amla, Kallis and AB who are phenomenal players of spin. the aussies have Clarke who is also a brilliant player of spin.
you forgot Mr cricket there who is brilliant player of spin as well.
I've got no time for sloggers in test matches!!!!
And last night Piers Morgan named Sehwag in his Test XI, LOL!