Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5

Author Topic: is Rikki Clarke the answer?  (Read 9342 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12714
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
is Rikki Clarke the answer?
« on: November 26, 2012, 01:27:17 PM »

if England want to play 2 spinners and 3 seamers, something has to give.
We also really need a quality slip catcher.

ladies and gentlemen, I offer up Rikky Clarke.

much improved batting and bowling since his move to the champions oh, and the best slip in the country
« Last Edit: November 26, 2012, 07:22:42 PM by Johnny »
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2012, 01:29:29 PM »

Best fielder.
I fear the fact he's a Spurs fan rules him out ;)
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2012, 01:29:42 PM »

Oddly I had a similar though a few days back.  He is not test class by a long chalk but he would not do manifestly worse in the sub continent than, say, Fat Sammy.  That said, he would have to bat six or seven, and he did not even do that for Warwickshire at times last season!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2012, 01:30:16 PM »

In all seriousness, I'd say Woakes is actually ahead of him in the important disciplines too.
And that's talking not about 'potential' which basically translates as 'not ready'. Woakes is a serious player.
Logged

Johnny

  • Administrator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4566
  • Trade Count: (+9)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2012, 01:33:08 PM »

In all seriousness, I'd say Woakes is actually ahead of him in the important disciplines too.
And that's talking not about 'potential' which basically translates as 'not ready'. Woakes is a serious player.

this
Logged
Email - Johnny@CustomBats.co.uk
Twitter - www.twitter.com/CustomBatsForum
Facebook - www.facebook.com/CustomBatsForum

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2012, 01:34:17 PM »

Woakes for me

Anderson can stand at slip and trott was not that bad
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2012, 01:39:17 PM »

Woakes....I wonder if they will ever get around to giving him a chance. 

He seems very talented, and he demonstrated when he played some ODIs in Australia that he has a fair bit of gumption too....but I wonder whether he is just a bit short of pace with the ball and just short of being a genuine batsman to get past Bresnan and, especially, the selectors darling Broad...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3294
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2012, 01:40:41 PM »

CLARKE! not a chance. not good enough at test level. Woakes is an option. unsure if theres anyone else in that mould atm
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2012, 01:42:21 PM »

We don't have a test class all rounder, full stop.  Doesn;t necessarily mean that there are not circumstances in which you have to go for the next best bet mind...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Johnny

  • Administrator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4566
  • Trade Count: (+9)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2012, 01:42:36 PM »

Woakes....I wonder if they will ever get around to giving him a chance. 

He seems very talented, and he demonstrated when he played some ODIs in Australia that he has a fair bit of gumption too....but I wonder whether he is just a bit short of pace with the ball and just short of being a genuine batsman to get past Bresnan and, especially, the selectors darling Broad...

Indeed - he looks like he's good enough to at least get a go - it's questionable whether either part of his game is truly test class, but I think the sum of the parts should be enough - I certainly think he has more about him than Fat Sam
Logged
Email - Johnny@CustomBats.co.uk
Twitter - www.twitter.com/CustomBatsForum
Facebook - www.facebook.com/CustomBatsForum

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2012, 01:43:01 PM »

In the same way glen Chapple was disgrigaded by England due to pace

Samit Patel is atop class batsman woakes is good but not on the same level as Patel not,even close
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

PedalsMcgrew

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2154
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2012, 01:44:18 PM »

Woakes is definitely a great shout, I'd actually forgotten all about him.....what about Stokes at Durham? He was the the next cab off the rank for a period a year or so ago....Last I heard he had a hurty finger.....
Logged
Lisa: How's my Rabbit?
Bart: He's dead and dad buried him in the garden, although not in that order..

essexarsenal

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 516
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2012, 01:44:33 PM »

Ben Stokes ? - sorry. Yes I agree Ben Stokes or Woakes.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2012, 01:44:48 PM »

Samit Patel is atop class batsman woakes is good but not on the same level as Patel not,even close

No he isn't.  He isn't even close to being a top class batsman!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: is Rikky Clarke the answer?
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2012, 01:46:47 PM »

Well we agree to disagree records state his record is better than average and I suspect given a go he would turn out fine just needs a long sustained chance I suspect, will he get it doubt it

Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
 

Advertise on CBF