Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Does anyone still use C6+  (Read 5550 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

PM7

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1165
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #15 on: January 16, 2013, 04:55:21 PM »

Im pretty sure the Puma Ballistic 6000 is the same handle and Aswani sells a few on Ebay at very good prices.
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8817
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #16 on: January 16, 2013, 06:30:22 PM »

Yep - I have a Ballistic 6000 in my collection and it has the same handle - they go very well!
I used to have a C6 Uzi but sold it as never got round to trying it, but from what I hear, they are very responsive!
Logged

Blank Bats

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Captain
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1158
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Blank Bats
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2013, 06:36:49 PM »

Hosk is the daddy . . . No doubt
Logged
Blank Bats
http://www.blankbats.co.uk
For more info email blankbats@gmail.com

Ciaran

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 910
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2013, 06:54:20 PM »

Yep - I have a Ballistic 6000 in my collection and it has the same handle - they go very well!
I used to have a C6 Uzi but sold it as never got round to trying it, but from what I hear, they are very responsive!

Damn! Why does no one have one they want to part with!
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2013, 07:31:17 PM »

I've had one of each. The C6+ weighed in just under three pounds and went like a train. The Ballistic I wasn't using do i sold. One thing I'd say about both is that the balance is a little odd due to their being so little weight in the handle.
Logged

Chad

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3010
  • Trade Count: (+22)
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #21 on: January 16, 2013, 07:35:26 PM »

I've had one of each. The C6+ weighed in just under three pounds and went like a train. The Ballistic I wasn't using do i sold. One thing I'd say about both is that the balance is a little odd due to their being so little weight in the handle.

Yeah, I would have suspected that with 3oz off the handle and added onto the blade. Was the handle pretty stiff on the C6+ Tim? I will probably get used to my Laver C-ten PB first before I even think of another carbon handle if that's the case!
Logged

Rew162

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 54
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2013, 11:55:35 PM »

I have a Uzi C6+, it's in pretty good as its my back up, has been back to Newbery last year  for a refurb (now has SPS stickers as they didn't have any C6+ kicking about in Hove). I agree about the feel it is different and takes a while to get used to but so does the sound it makes is very different to a traditional bat - get some funny looks from the oposition very now and again.
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Does anyone still use C6+
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2013, 07:18:17 AM »

Yeah, I would have suspected that with 3oz off the handle and added onto the blade. Was the handle pretty stiff on the C6+ Tim? I will probably get used to my Laver C-ten PB first before I even think of another carbon handle if that's the case!
Yes, there isn't a lot of whip...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF