Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Dodgy Rule?  (Read 22586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Riddy

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1057
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Dodgy Rule?
« on: February 11, 2013, 10:48:53 AM »

Had an indoor game yesterday. i was batting and we need something like 27 off the last 14 balls. I get a short ball and smah it straight back towards the bowler, going for the 6. I  creamed this ball, and bowler only has time to instinctively stick out a hand. The ball tips his finger, which diverts the ball smashing onto the umpires forehead and drops to the floor.

There was no doubting the ball was going for 6, nd im not saying the umpire did it intentionally, but i dont get the 6 runs and it goes down as a dot ball. we also ended up losing by 3 runs so it would have made a huge difference.

The umpire was fine btw
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2013, 11:08:33 AM »

Had an indoor game yesterday. i was batting and we need something like 27 off the last 14 balls. I get a short ball and smah it straight back towards the bowler, going for the 6. I  creamed this ball, and bowler only has time to instinctively stick out a hand. The ball tips his finger, which diverts the ball smashing onto the umpires forehead and drops to the floor.

There was no doubting the ball was going for 6, nd im not saying the umpire did it intentionally, but i dont get the 6 runs and it goes down as a dot ball. we also ended up losing by 3 runs so it would have made a huge difference.

The umpire was fine btw
The ball didn't go for six, therefore it's a dot ball. What's dodgy about that?
Logged

Riddy

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1057
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2013, 11:10:58 AM »

through not fault of my own, i've lost 6 runs and ( a ball, as it goes down as a dot ball). whats not dodgy about that?
Logged

aussiejake

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2013, 11:14:42 AM »

You play indoor with the umpire in the net? Strange.

Common sense says that it should have been called a dead ball and the ball rebowled.
Logged

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3294
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2013, 11:15:13 AM »

its part of the game. the only option could have been to call it a dead ball and re-bowl it but thats unlikely.

there is also the option of the ball flicking the bowlers finger but slowing it up enough for him to then take the rebound. you would then have been out and still no 6.

its frustrating when things like this 'go against you' but its all part of the game. shoe on the other foot, would you have offered to give the batting team a 6 or rebowl it? probably not
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

joeylough

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 830
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • One hit wonder
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2013, 11:15:23 AM »

well you haven't lost 6 runs as it never went. I can see the frustration as it should have gone for six. But its the same as when someone hits a nice drive and it hits the non strikers bat. Dot ball and carry on.
Logged
The edges of my bat take a beating, the middle is near enough new.
@joey_lough

dmacwana

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 66
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2013, 11:26:25 AM »

Nothing dodgy about that mate, part and parcel of the game. Ball hitting the stumps, the umpire or the non striker ..... just unlucky cannot do anything about it. Its a dot ball ... carry on. I am sure you wouldn't have give it as a six or re-bowled it had you been the bowler.
Logged

Riddy

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1057
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2013, 11:29:30 AM »

in all fairness i put a question mark at the end of 'dodgy rule'... so i'm not out right saying it was dodgy, more of a discussion topic. Obviously it was frustrating and extremely unlucky, and cost us the game. i still maintain it should at least be a deadball
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2013, 11:29:53 AM »

You play indoor with the umpire in the net? Strange.

Common sense says that it should have been called a dead ball and the ball rebowled.
Let's look at it in a different context. Playing outdoor cricket you pull a ball that is a surefire four, but it hits the Umpire on the leg. He isn't seriously injured, and the square leg fielder picks it up and throws it back to the keeper keeping it down to a single.

This isn't a dead ball and the situation is no different.
Logged

BigBlueMachine

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2013, 11:41:56 AM »

What would happen if the ball struck the umpire, flew up into the air and was caught by the bowler?
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2013, 11:46:02 AM »

Yeah, gotta say quick sooking and get on with the game (after checking that the guy was fine, of course...)
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2013, 11:47:54 AM »

What would happen if the ball struck the umpire, flew up into the air and was caught by the bowler?

Out, I think the ball is still live after it strikes an umpire.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2013, 11:48:37 AM »

Not out - similar to if it strikes the fielders helmet or the non-striker, it is live but deemed to have been grounded.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2013, 11:53:07 AM »

Not out - similar to if it strikes the fielders helmet or the non-striker, it is live but deemed to have been grounded.


http://www.lords.org/text-only/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-32-caught,58,ar.html

Its a fair catch according to this.

Law 32, 3E
Logged

tushar sehgal

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3874
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: Dodgy Rule?
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2013, 12:54:13 PM »

through not fault of my own, i've lost 6 runs and ( a ball, as it goes down as a dot ball). whats not dodgy about that?

Similar to hitting a glorious straight drive with no fielders on the boundary but ball hits the stumps and stops...Its unfortunate but not dodgy..
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
 

Advertise on CBF