Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 38

Author Topic: Australia in India 2013  (Read 45666 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Binsy

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #300 on: March 05, 2013, 08:54:29 AM »

Do they really need a 4th seamer though, especially when they've not taken any wickets as it is.

Got to play to their strengths though haven't they? While Maxwell and Doherty did get wickets, that wasn't' until Vijay and Pujara has put on 300+ runs and the were giveaways. I think the Indians would rather face Doherty and Maxwell than Johnson personally.
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5409
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #301 on: March 05, 2013, 09:05:04 AM »

Got to play to their strengths though haven't they? While Maxwell and Doherty did get wickets, that wasn't' until Vijay and Pujara has put on 300+ runs and the were giveaways. I think the Indians would rather face Doherty and Maxwell than Johnson personally.

Are they going toi have any more problems with their 4th choice seamer than the first 3 though, Doherty and Maxwell at least took wickets after they had pout on 300+ runs, the seamers never managed it at all.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

thedon

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 922
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #302 on: March 05, 2013, 12:00:58 PM »

India made aus look very ordinary. A year ago india were getting beaten 4-0 in aus. lets give india credit.
Logged

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #303 on: March 05, 2013, 01:12:13 PM »

India made aus look very ordinary. A year ago india were getting beaten 4-0 in aus. lets give india credit.
And remember it is in India! On Indian wickets etc. just forget about it and wait for the home series.
Logged

MD2812

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1504
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hi, I'm Joe
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #304 on: March 05, 2013, 01:24:05 PM »

First time in history a team has lost to an innings defeat after declaring in the first innings.

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #305 on: March 05, 2013, 01:28:22 PM »

And remember it is in India! On Indian wickets etc. just forget about it and wait for the home series.

Hmmm, but its also a fairly weak Indian side who lost at home to England, with bowlers who were routinely hammered by England....
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #306 on: March 05, 2013, 03:22:28 PM »

Hmmm, but its also a fairly weak Indian side who lost at home to England, with bowlers who were routinely hammered by England....
True, not saying the Aussies shouldn't be worried about it. More just everyone knew they'd be screwed as they have no decent slow bowling option. While I'd say the Indians spin is also pretty poor their batting with Pujara especially is at home and knows all they need to do is stay in and the runs flow. Aussies have no one really (Clarke excluded) who routinely seems happy to just plod. They all try and score at high rates which when it comes off looks good but more often an not it doesn't.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #307 on: March 05, 2013, 05:21:30 PM »

True, not saying the Aussies shouldn't be worried about it. More just everyone knew they'd be screwed as they have no decent slow bowling option. While I'd say the Indians spin is also pretty poor their batting with Pujara especially is at home and knows all they need to do is stay in and the runs flow. Aussies have no one really (Clarke excluded) who routinely seems happy to just plod. They all try and score at high rates which when it comes off looks good but more often an not it doesn't.

Actually you're underselling Clarke there - I don't actually think he is capable of just plodding - he's just so much better than the rest of the batsmen on display and in such amazing form that he can score at 75-80 in a Test match and make it look like he is plodding.

But the side as a whle.  I think the best comparison is with the last side they took to India, which was competitive despite similarly poor slow bowling options (remember, they picked Bear White as a spinner....)
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Jenko

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1277
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #308 on: March 06, 2013, 10:09:54 AM »

Anyone seen that video doing the rounds on YouTube at the moment...hitler finds out about Australian team selections...I won't post it here coz its pretty rude and people may get offended...but reasonably funny :)
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #310 on: March 06, 2013, 10:48:05 AM »

Clarke confirmed in an interview that he has no choice but to bat up the order
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #311 on: March 06, 2013, 10:49:01 AM »

love the way he phrased that!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #312 on: March 06, 2013, 10:52:54 AM »

Yeah and loved how he said he has had to do some coaching too haha
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author

Pendles10

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 106
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #313 on: March 06, 2013, 11:06:12 AM »

I dont think anyone is realising that Phil Hughes cannot play spin to save his life. Shane Watson is the X factor in the aus squad and the ground he made his last 100 on is the next test match. And should definately not be dropped. The batting order should be Warner, Cowan, Clarke, Watson, Khawaja, Wade, Henriques.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Australia in India 2013
« Reply #314 on: March 06, 2013, 11:07:28 AM »

Shane Watson is the X factor in the aus squad

Love it!!!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 38
 

Advertise on CBF