Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010  (Read 7204 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Six Sixes Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4335
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Six Sixes Cricket Ltd
H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« on: February 28, 2013, 11:27:16 PM »


M&H has a half grip at bottom of handle
Tempo's flat face

Chad

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3007
  • Trade Count: (+22)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2013, 11:30:46 PM »

IT WAS YOU!!! >:( Great stuff Rob, I have been wanting to see pictures of these two colossal bats together. Which reminds me that I owe you some pictures of that Woodworm, which I shall snap right now! 8)

The Tempo looks slightly fuller, which may be due to the flatter face, but you would expect that since it is a tiny tiny bit heavier!
Logged

Six Sixes Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4335
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Six Sixes Cricket Ltd
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2013, 11:31:34 PM »

The H4L is around an ounce heavier than the M&H, both have similar edge size of around 25mm and spine height of around 70mm. The finish on the H4L is beautifull, really nice finish. The flat face is not as flat looking as Lavers, maybe it is the bow in the h4l bat that make it seem so flat.

Six Sixes Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4335
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Six Sixes Cricket Ltd
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2013, 11:35:44 PM »

IT WAS YOU!!! >:( Great stuff Rob, I have been wanting to see pictures of these two colossal bats together. Which reminds me that I owe you some pictures of that Woodworm, which I shall snap right now! 8)

The Tempo looks slightly fuller, which may be due to the flatter face, but you would expect that since it is a tiny tiny bit heavier!
Yep, sorry bud it had to be done. I think i will remove one or both of the bottom stickers on the h4l, as i dont think they are needed.

tushar sehgal

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3874
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2013, 11:55:16 PM »

Why? Why? Why? these are just PERFECT :)

Also thanks for such lovely comparison via pics :)
Logged

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2013, 06:29:48 AM »

Sterling picture comparison, many thanks for it mate.

Do you notice any difference in pickup amongst these two?
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

Wedge2408

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 353
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2013, 09:50:15 AM »

A couple of awesome bats there mate!! Seeing them together makes for a nice comparison.
Fair to say I'm a little jealous :)
Logged
"I always give myself such very good advice, but I very seldom follow it."

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2013, 09:54:56 AM »

Very similar sticks, but in the profile shot the Distinction just looks much nicer, I'm not sure why, perhaps the stickers play a part, anyone else agree?
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2013, 10:21:59 AM »

My tempo is just under 2'12 and the edge profile looks a little different and comes in near 30mm. Is it the camera angle?

Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

goodarmcindy

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2013, 10:29:16 AM »

Very similar sticks, but in the profile shot the Distinction just looks much nicer, I'm not sure why, perhaps the stickers play a part, anyone else agree?

I'm with you mate. I'd side with the Distinction in this face-off; the middle looks a little lower, too.
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #10 on: March 01, 2013, 11:12:37 AM »

I think it's the sort of roman/birds nose that the Tempo has at the toe that puts me off. Purely an aesthetics thing though I guess.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

fasteddie

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1507
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Straight up.
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2013, 01:38:11 PM »

Either bat will see you right.

How do you choose?

The M&H looks more concaved in the pictures. Is that correct or the camera angle?
Logged

tushar sehgal

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3874
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2013, 01:45:34 PM »

My tempo is just under 2'12 and the edge profile looks a little different and comes in near 30mm. Is it the camera angle?



D7's is a flat faced one and that might be the reason ???
Logged

farnham_quins_2

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 990
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #13 on: March 01, 2013, 09:03:52 PM »

That Tempo looks amazing! Prefer that to the Distinction
Logged
-------------Farnham Harlequins CC------------

--------That's What We Do--------MFC--------

Six Sixes Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4335
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Six Sixes Cricket Ltd
Re: H4L Tempo v M&H Distinction 2010
« Reply #14 on: March 01, 2013, 09:47:40 PM »

Either bat will see you right.

How do you choose?

The M&H looks more concaved in the pictures. Is that correct or the camera angle?
The m&h is very slightly more concaved but the spine is more rounder where as the h4l is more angled
Pages: [1] 2
 

Advertise on CBF