Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule  (Read 3392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« on: March 04, 2013, 02:30:06 PM »
Logged

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2013, 03:16:22 PM »
It needed clarifying so that's a plus!!

Now it is fair I suppose
Logged

tushar sehgal

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3874
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2013, 05:22:42 PM »
I am glad its clarified but not sure if its a 100% fair, i don't know why i think that but just does not seem right...
Logged

rajesh500

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 328
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2013, 05:32:47 PM »
declaring a no ball is not fair for bowler i feel..  i think, it should be declared a dead ball to be fair..
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2013, 05:36:19 PM »
why should it be a dead ball?  the bowler has run up and delivered a ball which was not legal, I think a penalty is entirely fair.

if the batsman breaks the stumps at his end, he's out. 
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

fatbats

  • Forum Sponsor
  • County 2nd XI
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 412
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Fat Bats
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2013, 06:24:36 PM »
Quote from: Manormanic on March 04, 2013, 05:36:19 PM
why should it be a dead ball?  the bowler has run up and delivered a ball which was not legal, I think a penalty is entirely fair.

if the batsman breaks the stumps at his end, he's out. 

I agree with this as should be penalised as should not be happening as said of batsmen hits stumps he's out not dead ball
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 5435
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2013, 08:53:28 PM »
Doesnt feel like a perfect solution, but I can't think of anything that would work better!
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2013, 08:56:48 PM »
There was a simple solution which Finn missed. He should have appealed every time he hit the stumps and tried to claim a mankad...
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2013, 09:07:53 PM »
actually, given he did sometimes hit em with his hand (though mostly the trailing knee) that might have been right sometimes...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

toenails97

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1822
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2013, 08:02:05 AM »
I agree with this as I know how distracting it can be!
We will just have to see how Finn resolves his current problem!
Logged

Kieron_BT

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 983
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • WK - Millhouses Works CC - SYSCL
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2013, 04:19:21 PM »
Does anyone know if this type of No Ball results in a free hit?
Logged
Born To Play Cricket, Forced To Work. Love The Game.

neilcounter

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2013, 05:08:38 PM »
I thought a free hit was only awarded for a front or back foot violation, so I would assume not.
Logged

Jagminder

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Bowler hit stumps, no ball rule
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2013, 06:04:12 PM »
Quote from: tim2000s on March 04, 2013, 08:56:48 PM
There was a simple solution which Finn missed. He should have appealed every time he hit the stumps and tried to claim a mankad...
You, Sir, are a GENIUS :D
Dying laughing in a team meeting looking at this.

Jag.
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF