There are enormous (cricketing and non-cricketing) advantages bestowed upon UK children whose parents are able to purchase a private education for their kids. Sports scholarships allow some cricketing talent to breach the class divide, access the elite system, but such places are few and far between. Cricket clubs do what they can, but how many clubs have pitches of standard found in private schools and coaches who are able to devote high attention to individuals?
So naturally, in the current system, children of wealthy parents will have huge advantages over the poorer kids. The rich kids will get a better coach-player ratio, better facilities, better equipment, and grow up in an environment of achievment and aspiration. The best ‘poor talent’ will still shine though (you can’t buy motivation, determination, perserverence, practice, and pushy parents), but the pool will be smaller and barriers to overcome larger.
Wouldn’t it be great (for cricket and everything else) if all private education in the UK was abolished/prohibited (along with all religious based state education!) and up until the age of 18 a combination of distance and lottery system would determine what school you went to. So schools like Eton would be opened up to kids in Slough’s housing estates - imagine all those black&asian kids having access to the luxury of Eton’s cricketing facilities!
Now that’s a move that would really make Britain ‘great’.