Apologies if a similar topic has been posted elsewhere but it's been a few hours since I've moaned about something lol
Last Saturday we played on a deck covered in small cracks. It looked a bit dirty, bare, didn't bounce much (as I found out to my cost when batting) and should of been absolutely ideal for the attack we had. The oppo had a virtually all seam attack and we had spin/trundle. All it needed was somebody to bowl some cutters on the gripping surface and we were home. I bowled my spin, getting some real turn and bounce which is unusual for me. Redders turned into Swann and bowled the number 3 through the gate. However at the other end and for parts of the innings it looked a different pitch. Our seamers, with one exception, just couldn't make use of the deck. If it doesn't seam or swing, no plan B. It was a shame as it just needed someone to roll their fingers over it but we duly lost by 5 wickets. Should've been by 3 wickets but 2 plumb decisions got turned down - they were clinging on. Made me think about how many bowlers could bowl old fashioned cutters. I learnt playing Sunday cricket on worn batting tracks, but while everybody knows how to swing a ball very few know how to bowl a cutter. Many out there will argue it's a wet wicket delivery but it can be used on any surface taking spin. It's easier to bowl than a slower ball and can be bowled at a similar speed to seam up. Does seem to have gone out of the game, when I was younger many teams had bowlers sticking it on a length and cutting the ball back in.
Is it me or has it gone out of the game?