Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 52 53 [54] 55 56 ... 111

Author Topic: The Ashes 2013  (Read 150799 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

MD2812

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1504
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hi, I'm Joe
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #795 on: July 19, 2013, 01:14:41 PM »

I haven't seen it as I'm following BBC live text.

Was there enough evidence to overrule the original decision?

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #796 on: July 19, 2013, 01:15:52 PM »

There was no evidence on hotspot not a mark
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

johnnyw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2058
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #797 on: July 19, 2013, 01:16:22 PM »

Hughes was not out. Look at priors reaction. He only appealed after he seen the slips go up. Hughes also knew he did not edge it
Logged

PM7

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1165
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #798 on: July 19, 2013, 01:17:40 PM »

There seems to be a trend by the 3rd umpire to not overule the on field umpires decision.
There was no hotspot there so they are now going by noise ????
Logged

Abighugeappl

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 264
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #799 on: July 19, 2013, 01:18:36 PM »

I have to say, hotspot hasn't been very convincing so far this series.

Surely they can tell how old a hotspot is? This would definitely help in the case of Root with his pad/bat bat/pad dismissal
Logged

PedalsMcgrew

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2154
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #800 on: July 19, 2013, 01:23:34 PM »

Didn't snicko just show that he did nick it?
Logged
Lisa: How's my Rabbit?
Bart: He's dead and dad buried him in the garden, although not in that order..

400notout

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 971
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #801 on: July 19, 2013, 01:25:58 PM »

Umps dont get the use of snicko.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #802 on: July 19, 2013, 01:26:52 PM »

Yes but hotspot know and as snicko is not being used it should have been overturned unless the umpire just knew
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Vic Nicholas

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1301
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #803 on: July 19, 2013, 01:29:49 PM »

Definitely not convinced by that hotspot!

But snicko seemed to indicated that there was some sound?
Logged

Leddster138

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 247
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #804 on: July 19, 2013, 01:30:42 PM »

I haven't seen it as I'm following BBC live text.

Was there enough evidence to overrule the original decision?

Are you smashing the refresh button as much as me!!! I hate being stuck at work :(
Logged

Vic Nicholas

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1301
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #805 on: July 19, 2013, 01:32:34 PM »

Given the dire situation, was it asking too much from Khawaja to play responsibly?

That was plain dumb. Awful shot in any circumstances, let alone when your team is teetering.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #806 on: July 19, 2013, 01:32:46 PM »

Does smith have to spit ever ball
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

MD2812

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1504
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hi, I'm Joe
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #807 on: July 19, 2013, 01:33:10 PM »

Yes but hotspot know and as snicko is not being used it should have been overturned unless the umpire just knew

This seems like a rare decision which is similar to an LBW going on umpire's call.

If not out and reveiwed it sounds like it wouldn't have been given out.

Is the noise as the ball passes the bat?

The 3rd umpire will have been looking for a reason it was not out, rather than confirming it was out.

MD2812

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1504
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hi, I'm Joe
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #808 on: July 19, 2013, 01:34:14 PM »

Are you smashing the refresh button as much as me!!! I hate being stuck at work :(

Haha yes! I listened to the first test on radio through my phone, then got a text from network saying used all my data up  :(

I have become the master of F5 and Alt+Tab to switch screens.

Wedge2408

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 353
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #809 on: July 19, 2013, 01:35:14 PM »

Bloody hell khawaja, what were you thinking?!  What an absolutely stupid shot to play given the situation.
Logged
"I always give myself such very good advice, but I very seldom follow it."
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 [54] 55 56 ... 111
 

Advertise on CBF