Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 77 78 [79] 80 81 ... 111

Author Topic: The Ashes 2013  (Read 150598 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

sgcricket

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1102
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1170 on: August 02, 2013, 06:14:30 PM »

It looked as if Cook talked him out of the review. Really strange. Goes to show that teams don't trust the DRS. It is a strategic tool for them.
Logged

PM7

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1165
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1171 on: August 02, 2013, 06:28:24 PM »

Good to see the Aussies in the fight and its the first day they have won each and every session. England will have to bat really well and in an odd way im really pleased for the Aussies. England should win the series comfortably but for the neutrals its important that there actually is a contest.
The last test was too one sided and a few more like the first test will get the blood pumping.
Logged

Giraffe208

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1022
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1172 on: August 02, 2013, 06:38:42 PM »

Excellent first innings from Australia. Started really well with the ball too. Bresnan dismissal was a strange one. I dont doubt Cook didn't want him to use a review just in case BUT surely Bresnan knew he didn't get near it?
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5436
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1173 on: August 03, 2013, 08:59:44 AM »

I presumed one of their DRS plans was probably that nightwatchmen weren't to waste a review if there was any doubt involved.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

03jaworf

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 170
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1174 on: August 03, 2013, 09:03:03 AM »

surely he would have known if he'd have nicked it or not though as he was quite far away from it in the end.  After all that though it's just another poor decision in a long line of poor decisions during this series
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1175 on: August 03, 2013, 09:16:53 AM »

Is that a Powerspot Strauss is using in The Ashes Zone
Logged

lukemannionzimbabwe

  • Colts
  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 332
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1176 on: August 03, 2013, 10:21:48 AM »

Is that a Powerspot Strauss is using in The Ashes Zone
tis indeed

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

Logged
🇿🇼

Vic Nicholas

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1301
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1177 on: August 03, 2013, 10:31:43 AM »

I presumed one of their DRS plans was probably that nightwatchmen weren't to waste a review if there was any doubt involved.

This.

The night watchman doesn't get the benefit of a DRS call I reckon.
Logged

potzy248

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1676
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1178 on: August 04, 2013, 09:40:07 AM »

Watching the Fox sports team of Brendan Julian, Stuart Clarke and Graham Hick. BJ was talking about KPs inside edge LBW decision. "I can live with that" he says. You should have heard them the other day with Khawaja's DRS call, Whining all day. Aussie muppets.
Logged
Kane Williamson for Prime Minister.

Jacky

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 178
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1179 on: August 04, 2013, 09:44:00 AM »

Watching the Fox sports team of Brendan Julian, Stuart Clarke and Graham Hick. BJ was talking about KPs inside edge LBW decision. "I can live with that" he says. You should have heard them the other day with Khawaja's DRS call, Whining all day. Aussie muppets.

Inside edge LBW's are a regular occurrence, DRS stuffing up that badly isn't.
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1180 on: August 04, 2013, 09:44:48 AM »

A clear mark on the bat and a noise on snicko. It's a shame that so many are being made wrong.

Do you think it couple be size of the screen they use? Having large TVs at home and its obvious. Do they use small screens where small marks are harder to spot?
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

Jacky

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 178
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1181 on: August 04, 2013, 09:46:59 AM »

I think that there needs to be specific third umpires who specialise in dealing with the DRS and the technology associated with it.
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8822
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1182 on: August 04, 2013, 11:15:50 AM »

Two points I would make a out DRS are as follows:

1. They need to be absolutely clear about whether their job is to overrule the umpire if they are 75% sure, or whether their job is to confirm that there is not the 100% evidence required to overrule, or something else....plus what tools they can use in the review!
2. Umpires undergo lots of training so there using DRS needs to be a specialist role and treated as such!
Logged

Marc28

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 643
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1183 on: August 04, 2013, 11:30:56 AM »

Warner to open the batting
wouldnt it be massively funny if he was out first ball

Logged

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Ashes 2013
« Reply #1184 on: August 04, 2013, 11:33:49 AM »

Two points I would make a out DRS are as follows:

1. They need to be absolutely clear about whether their job is to overrule the umpire if they are 75% sure, or whether their job is to confirm that there is not the 100% evidence required to overrule, or something else....plus what tools they can use in the review!
2. Umpires undergo lots of training so there using DRS needs to be a specialist role and treated as such!

I think the DRS umpire should be in a room away from the influences caused by watching the game and only see the DRS referral on a screen when required
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author
Pages: 1 ... 77 78 [79] 80 81 ... 111
 

Advertise on CBF