George Bailey rose to stardom in 2011 when announced as the permanent t20 captain of Australia. He then made his debut against India as captain.
Bailey is now no longer a t20 specialist, he now has his name plastered across the One day team and has captained them a fair amount as Michael Clarke's back proves the Bain of his existence.
Recently in India and England before that, George batted exceptionally well but always fell as he pushed for that ton.
He batted with such conviction and precision, similar to that of a bloke called Hussey, that must not have gone unnoticed by the selectors and ofcourse Michael Clarke himself. The thing is that Bailey was smart with his batting, he effectively made the English and Indians skipper change his field after Bailey smashed a few fours down that way, then the shot would change, down the ground, behind square. An ideal number 4 batsmen, To many a welcome edition the the Australian batting line up.
Doubts have already arisen about Clarke's back, therefore who would the Aussies bolster the middle order should their talisman not be there to lead from the front? Also how would become skip?? Brad Haddin is a smart cricketer but Bailey is from evidence a very clever cricketer and captain..
The only question is can Bailey cope in the Test Arena, he will be needed to hit runs if he bats at four and hit those centuries. He appears to be the mister reliable at the moment but form can be temporary as Jonathon Trott found out during the Ashes.
Would he cope? I believe that bailey would be a class number 4 batsman and fill the void of the middle order that would allow Clarke to drop to 5.
What does everyone else think? I've watched bailey for a while, seen him play shield cricket (was a very long night up)
If you were the Australian selectors, who would you have as your test XI for the Ashes?
Sorry I went off a bit haha! But wanted a discussion about the test teams!!