Carbs did ok, but at the end, it was similar the KP dismissal. There were two there waiting for the catch.
Bell came out aggressive from the start, he could easily mis-timed one to a fielder rather than space.
It seems that they have a bit of bad luck and a lot of bad batting. It could have been a lot worse.
Bowlers don't seem to be helping much either, very solid without being outstanding. You cant see any of them ripping through the Aussies.
I'm not blaming Carberry for his dismissal, absolute blinder from admittedly a very good fielder - its not a high risk shot. As for that starting the collapse, I don't subscribe to that. They are all professioanl cricketers and have a responsible for their own technique and mindset. I'm more likely to blame KP for that ridiculous shot with the trap set. You've got eyes fella, use 'em!
Yes, Bell could have mis timed, but is he likely to in this form on that deck?! Clarke COULD have spooned his first ball on day 2 to a fielder as well. 'Could' never 'did...'
Here are my thoughts on the differences between last summer and this Ashes to date.
1) England let Australia off to a point in the final test at the Oval. They shouldn't have experimented, they should have stuck to their successful formula and maintained momentum into this series. They missed a trick in getting into Australia's minds with incessant pressure. Australia started planning for 2013/14 last summer. England not until they flew out.
2) They will never admit it, but England looked at the 2010/11 series, the 3-0 in the summer, thought they had it in the bag and lacked preparation based on a bit of arrogance and complacency. Their warm ups were nowhere near the quality of three years ago and, partly due to the fifth test in the summer, came in with an unsettled side. They left themselves lacking strength in depth when Trott came home and hadn't planned for all outcomes.
3) Haddin was better than Prior last summer. Haddin is significantly better than Prior now. Again, there is no strength in depth. Clearly they don't rate Bairstow as a batsman and his keeping isn't Test class. prior brings so much with his keeping, vice-captaincy and on-field knowledge, but they need to start succession planning in all areas.
4) Clarke clearly enjoys batting at home and is handling the captaincy much better than Cook. He is top, top class.
5) If England's prep has been average, Australia have clearly gone away and done their homework and left no stone unturned. They have learnt from 2010/11 and the summer. The attention to detail in their focus, psychology, game and situation planning and mindset is clearly huge. Anyone else thinking Johnson's muzzy is deliberate? Shades of Merv and the aggression of the 90s? It's not Movember anymore...
6) I'm a subscriber that you create your luck. You could argue England have been unlucky losing Trott, but his form wasn't great last summer. England almost won last summer by default (no 400+ first innings score - would we have won tests like that in 2005 and 2009?). If you are not batting well, everything else needs to click -the bowlers haven't and the fielding has been average. We talk about England's batting unit but the bowlers have shipped runs in both Tests. Yes, there's an element of chicken and egg in that, but the bowlers are looking ordinary, helped in part by Johnson's incredible form - looks like he's going to have an Alderman-esque impact on this series... I take onboard previous posts, but you have to say overall across their careers, performing across the world, Anderson is a better bowler than Johnson and, all being equal, Anderson and Broad are a better pairing than Johnson and Harris, over the course of their careers. But in the here and now, its no contest.
7) The psychology of elite sport is incredible - this is exactly why I studied it. Johnson's self efficacy is so high at the minute he thinks he's going to take a wicket with every ball. he's also been very well managed by the staff and his captain. Compare him to previous series to now to see the difference. Maybe a couple of technical tweaks, but mainly its his mindset and still (amazingly) some ex pro's across various sports think psychology has no place in elite sport - unbelievable.
Australia have unleashed Johnson, who didn't play in England, high on confidence and pace on quick, bouncy tracks. England have no surprise bowlers for Australia to contend with and their matchwinners have been nullified by the pitches.
My concern? Momentum is everything in sport and this really could go 5-0. Australia have to be odds-on in Perth and at 3-0, Ashes gone, what do England have to play for?
Hopefully this isn't an Englishman in denial...