Sorry to ignite this thread again, but questions I had from reading all 10 pages.
I'm going to make the presumption that Cricketforlove13 is on the payroll of Shrey. It's a shame FastEddie was no on the forum over Xmas as he would love the representation of the company from his posts and spelling (Yes I'm aware English is unlikely to be his first language, but if you're dealing with internationals around the world, I'm sure you have someone sufficient. My English isn't perfect and it's my only language, but I've not a brand to represent)
My main question is this:
Why when all other helmet manufacturers are trying to improve safety, would Shrey sit there and (appear to) refuse to do so. In my experience companies who rest on their laurels tend to be left behind. As they say in formula one, if you're not moving forwards, you're moving backwards.
If ,in the hypothetical situation, the companies who follow the new ICC laws are making safer helmets and injuries are just happening to the pros wearing companies which have not followed these, that's bad marketing isn't it? A Shrey batsman gets hit on the grill it crushes the windpipe in his throat and another player runs on with a Masuri, Ayrtek, Albion etc etc then that will speak volumes on brands. This could happen the other way, but I know who my faith would sit with.