the player has to be worth his place in the team. if you wanted funky fields you may as well have Rory Hamilton-Brown!
Hmmmm...it tends to be that we give the captaincy to the best batsman in the side (Hussain, Vaughan, Strauss, Cook) and that batsman's productivity then tails off considerably - the only person to briefly exempt themself from that rule being KP in his very brief stint in charge.
That being the case, its reasonable to ask whether it is a better idea to have Cook averaging 25 instead of 55 and Carberry averaging 30, or to have Cook freed from the shackles of captaincy averaging in the 50s again and someone else averaging 30?
So to Gale. I don't rate him in the top five batsmen in the country, so please don't think I've gone mad. But he is in the top 15-20, and has a solid career record with an average in the high 30s, most of that whilst doing the highest pressure job in English cricket outside the national team. His record is here:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/player/13533.htmlThat number compares very well with Ben Stokes (35) and Fat Sammy Patel (39) who have been deemed good enough to bat in the top six by England...