Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10

Author Topic: Cook - who would take over?  (Read 47944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #90 on: December 29, 2013, 09:34:53 PM »

I've only managed to watch the highlights of this series or 'lowlights' so I've not seen every minute

My overall impression, is that Mitchell Johnson, has pulled apart our batters, both technically and mentally?
They just couldn't handle the 90 plus mph and bounce off the wicket from a left hander
Which also meant the other bowlers could take full advantage


He has had a good series but he's not exactly in the Akhtar/Wasim/Waqar class of fast bowling. We have made him look like that which is very disappointing. Imagine this crop going up against them... :o

Watching it last night, Warne had a few words for Cook and his captaincy. I had to agree with his viewpoint. You could tell that Athers really wanted to agree with him but could'nt publically...ex England captain convention!!

I thought Cooks treatment of Monty was embarassing for him and would have done nothing for his confidence. Incredibly short sighted in my view given that he is now our senior spinner. When he did bring him on. it was the oposite side to where Lyon had taken his wickets  >:(
Logged

lewis_faulds

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 520
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Retired. Student.
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #91 on: December 29, 2013, 09:50:37 PM »

Do you think England should consider asking Vaughan, Hussain and Strauss to talk to Cook? They are all experienced England 'heroes'. May be worthwhile getting some former skips to give him advice?
Logged

Steveo1000

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #92 on: December 29, 2013, 09:56:04 PM »

Do you think England should consider asking Vaughan, Hussain and Strauss to talk to Cook? They are all experienced England 'heroes'. May be worthwhile getting some former skips to give him advice?
I guess no idea is a bad idea, I suspect though that this the last thing Cook wants right now.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #93 on: December 29, 2013, 10:06:03 PM »

Strauss has a future i think in some capacity with the England team
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12676
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #94 on: December 29, 2013, 10:06:57 PM »

all eng captains have multiple sesions with Brearley
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #95 on: December 29, 2013, 10:11:16 PM »

all eng captains have multiple sesions with Brearley

Simon Hughes said this on the radio, but did temper it with how the modern game has moved on.

Not much to be done than suck it up and move on with purpose.
Logged

keysersolze

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 859
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #96 on: December 29, 2013, 10:17:21 PM »

Who would want take over as captain or coach its a very septic England squad!!!!! Biggest problem is relying on foreign talent qualifying for England via the length of residency, and in addition to this the   failure to blood genuine English talent at international level and stick with them while they learn. Makes you wonder what the future holds when Irish and South African born players and some who have even played for Ireland etc are then accepted into the English squad with open arms makes you wonder if they believe in English talent at all!!!!!!!
Logged

sloggerroz

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 279
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #97 on: December 29, 2013, 10:33:49 PM »

Also simon hughes has just tweeted if we win the last one in sydney that would be 4-4 in a 10 match series, thats not too bad is it?
Logged

Mtown Don

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 161
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #98 on: December 30, 2013, 10:40:55 AM »


Also simon hughes has just tweeted if we win the last one in sydney that would be 4-4 in a 10 match series, thats not too bad is it?

England win on away goals...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Logged

BigBlueMachine

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #99 on: December 30, 2013, 11:15:22 AM »

Also simon hughes has just tweeted if we win the last one in sydney that would be 4-4 in a 10 match series, thats not too bad is it?

Doesn't it then go on count back. Which would mean Aus win 4-1.
Logged

Tail Ender

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 420
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #100 on: December 30, 2013, 02:10:20 PM »

Also simon hughes has just tweeted if we win the last one in sydney that would be 4-4 in a 10 match series, thats not too bad is it?

The words 'clutching', 'at' and 'straws' spring to mind there. Whatever gives your lot solace though.
Logged
"Cricket was my reason for living" - Harold Larwood

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12676
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #101 on: December 30, 2013, 03:50:19 PM »

The words 'clutching', 'at' and 'straws' spring to mind there.

I have to agree.

two different series. I would rather have the ashes than any fanciful moral high ground.

we have been hammered. the only way to improve is to accept that
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #102 on: December 30, 2013, 03:56:19 PM »

I have to agree.

two different series. I would rather have the ashes than any fanciful moral high ground.

we have been hammered. the only way to improve is to accept that

At the end of the day, it is played 2, won 1, lost 1, so not the end of the world as many seem to make out.

We have been outplayed most of the time in this series and few positives coming out of it.  It is how the team respond and bounce back in the summer which is key.

Ot would be nice to leave Aus with the Ashes, and I expected Eng to pit up more of a fight.
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #103 on: December 30, 2013, 04:25:07 PM »

Maybe we should play 2 match test series. That way the worst defeat we could have is a 2-0 drubbing. Sounds a lot better and our bowlers would be nice and fresh.
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: Cook - who would take over?
« Reply #104 on: December 30, 2013, 04:31:22 PM »

With all this talk of Cook and Flower and all the rest of them leaving, do you think it has anything to do with Paul Downton taking over from Hugh Morris?

I don't know how it could, but you have to ask.
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
 

Advertise on CBF