Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Carberry broken bat incident  (Read 3563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Carberry broken bat incident
« on: January 05, 2014, 07:39:54 PM »

Just got me thinking. Assuming that Haddin wasn'tt taking the mick, what position would that leave Carberry in with everyone knowing he is batting with a restickered GN.

Isnt this some form of misselling if you are inducing people to a certain range when your not actually using it? Generally, we know pro's often have them custom made so is the culture of the big bat makers somewhat devious...accepting this kind of thing just for the media coverage?
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2014, 07:49:12 PM »

Pretty sure Haddin was taking the Mick.....

Sent from my HTC One mini using Tapatalk

Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2014, 07:54:29 PM »

Haddin is also sponsored by Kookaburra, I'm 99% certain he said it as a joke...
Logged

SelectCricket

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 196
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Best Batting Score - 201 Best Bowling - 2/6 LOL
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2014, 08:11:06 PM »

They were even laughing and talking about it on commentary as a joke.

I don't think Haddin would expose that his own sponsor are just stickering up bats
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2014, 08:13:54 PM »

No it was a deflection thing and aimed at Bailey a GN sponsored player.
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2014, 08:16:05 PM »

Quite possibly  ;)

Still the general point stands though...sponsored players using another brands bats.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2014, 08:17:07 PM »

Some brands do not make there own bats so yes some use other brands bats.
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

jackmorris

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 196
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2014, 08:36:55 PM »

what did haddin actually say? cant quite work it out from the video on youtube??
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2014, 08:39:43 PM »

I head Clarke say something about sympathy
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2014, 08:48:40 PM »

Just got me thinking. Assuming that Haddin wasn'tt taking the mick, what position would that leave Carberry in with everyone knowing he is batting with a restickered GN.

Isnt this some form of misselling if you are inducing people to a certain range when your not actually using it? Generally, we know pro's often have them custom made so is the culture of the big bat makers somewhat devious...accepting this kind of thing just for the media coverage?

To answer my thoughts on your actual question. I'd have no idea who uses what on the whole but there are a lot who are basically using stickered up bats. I personally believe it's miss selling when player x is promoting say a kook kahuna but not using it... Not exactly endorsing it if you won't use it !!
Logged

ManHOOS

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2014, 08:55:19 PM »

Haddin was pleasing his boss i-e Kookaburra  :D

I am pretty sure it was all fun, they were teasing him !
Logged

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2014, 08:58:48 PM »

To answer my thoughts on your actual question. I'd have no idea who uses what on the whole but there are a lot who are basically using stickered up bats. I personally believe it's miss selling when player x is promoting say a kook kahuna but not using it... Not exactly endorsing it if you won't use it !!

That pretty much sums up the general point i'm making. I know money talks but at the very minimum thay should use the endorsing companies products.
Logged

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2014, 08:59:37 PM »

Haddin was pleasing his boss i-e Kookaburra  :D

I am pretty sure it was all fun, they were teasing him !

I think so...he was laughing when he said it.
Logged

AlanB

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 669
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2014, 09:04:46 PM »


Agree that the bats should be those of the sponsoring manufacturer.
Conversely, how would the manufacture feel if such an incident happened when if is not their kit at fault?
Logged

Abighugeappl

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 264
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Carberry broken bat incident
« Reply #14 on: January 05, 2014, 09:07:32 PM »

Aussies seeing a Kook breaking are obviously going to be put off ,somewhat, of buying one, so Haddin was trying to say that it wasn't one, to save brand identity?
I don't see how people can take this as "Oh it's really bad that Carberry is using a stickered up bat", when in reality the majority of pro's do
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
 

Advertise on CBF