Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?  (Read 6241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2014, 12:16:10 PM »

- Cook (as he is captain)
- Hales (for a bit of aggression, rather than real quality test-match-ness or maybe Robson)
- Ali (although would much prefer Trott - he might play a county 2s game next week at Stamford Bridge vs Yorkshire)
- Bell
- Ballance
- Root (could open, but might be better down order with Ballance and Buttler)
- Buttler (for fun, Foster for wicketkeeping)
- Stokes (if fit, otherwise Patel)
- Jordan
- Broad
- Anderson

Bit of youthfulness.  Think Root and Buttler could make it interesting in the middle order.  Plus some big hitting from Hales at the top and Jordan toward the end.

Everyone can bat around Cook and Ali.

4 seamers and a couple of part-time spinners (if Stokes is fit).
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2014, 12:45:03 PM »

The team I would like to watch(on (semi realistic)entertainment/record value)
Cook
Root
Bell
Ali
Bopara
Patel
Davies(WK)
Jordan
Anderson
Finn
Monty/Mills(depending on conditions)

Logged

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2014, 12:51:40 PM »

If England don't pick there best XI then I wouldn't pay, that means KP playing in my book. It happens to often now by the ECB, in the quest for money . I watched 15 overs of crap ODI cricket at Edgbaston last year while the England "B" fumbled around. No point charging top dollar for an average team.
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9707
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #18 on: May 28, 2014, 12:51:58 PM »

I think you should be in it Buzz - you'd 'bloomin' well get on with it!'
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

richthekeeper

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #19 on: May 28, 2014, 01:03:48 PM »

I'd love to see a "proper" wicketkeeper in the side not one of these lads who's a good bat and can catch a bit.

With the emergence of Stokes as potentially a genuine all-rounder, plus Chris Jordan showing some real ability with the bat, this is becoming more of a possibility.

How about:

Cook (c)
Root
Ali
Bell
Taylor
Buttler/Hales
Stokes
Foster (wk)
Broad
Jordan / Panesar (depending on conditions)
Anderson

« Last Edit: May 28, 2014, 01:08:11 PM by richthekeeper »
Logged

george_parv

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2014, 01:18:59 PM »

Cook (C)
Carberry
Trott
KP
Bopara
Hales
Stokes
Foster (wk)
Anderson
Finn
Rashid

EDIT: Scratch that if I'm paying I want KP, Bell-> KP
« Last Edit: May 28, 2014, 01:47:11 PM by george_parv »
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2014, 01:51:34 PM »

I am absolutely staggered that, when the concept is of picking a side you'd actually pay to see, EVERYONE has picked Alistair Cook as captain.

Lets be clear - he ain't much of a batsman to watch, but at least he is statistically effective.  But he is without a shadow of a doubt the single worst captain in Test history. 
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2014, 01:53:40 PM »

And if I'm paying, and the side are still being picked to try and win, I'd go for:

Root
Cook
Bell
Pietersen (C)
Morgan
Stokes
Rashid
Foster (W)
Jordan
Plunkett
Anderson
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

richthekeeper

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2014, 02:03:04 PM »

i might be choosing a side i'd pay to watch, but i haven't suddenly been appointed as chairman of selectors. in that case, Cook is the captain.
Logged

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2014, 02:03:05 PM »

good call on Plunkett
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2014, 02:09:16 PM »

Something along the lines of:

Hales
Ali
Bell
Root (C)
Morgan
Stokes
Butler (WK)
Borthwick
Jordan
Overton
Mills

Might as well start to build for the future rather than the same old guard.
4 seamers, a leg spinner and Root and Ali as the back up spin options, why aren't I a selector?
Logged

fros23

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #26 on: May 28, 2014, 02:20:47 PM »

I am absolutely staggered that, when the concept is of picking a side you'd actually pay to see, EVERYONE has picked Alistair Cook as captain.

Lets be clear - he ain't much of a batsman to watch, but at least he is statistically effective.  But he is without a shadow of a doubt the single worst captain in Test history.

I'm watching Cook captain a side with 3 slips and a short leg in an ODI, but he hasn't got a couple of short midwickets like Clarke or McCullum do so therefore it's still negative.   ???
Logged
Twitter - @fros231

Sam

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1582
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #27 on: May 28, 2014, 02:30:59 PM »

Cook
Carberry
Taylor
Vince
Bell/Morgan
Stokes
Buttler
Borthwick
Jordan
Plunkett
Anderson

Don't quite see why people would be picking Hales when he's struggling to get in a county team  :D.
Logged

Toby

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #28 on: May 28, 2014, 02:36:08 PM »

Cook
Compton
Bell
Root
Taylor
Stokes
Buttler
Borthwick
Plunkett
Broad
Anderson
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12674
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: as a paying punter, what team would you rather the selectors chose?
« Reply #29 on: May 28, 2014, 02:44:27 PM »

Don't quite see why people would be picking Hales when he's struggling to get in a county team  :D.

Alex Hales is our answer to David Warner. He was picked because of his talent and his state were told to pick him...
In fact Warner played for Aus without even playing first class cricket (T20 and ODI stuff).

god forbid that would happen in England
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.
Pages: 1 [2] 3
 

Advertise on CBF