Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 31

Author Topic: the stuart broad incident  (Read 95936 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #150 on: August 11, 2014, 04:33:16 PM »

My top of the range carbon lid with acis liner.






Granted it currently has the steel grill on not titanium(I have the titanium grill on my cheap ayrtek, which the fitment is perfectly on it) but fitment is same either way
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #151 on: August 11, 2014, 05:40:06 PM »

My top of the range carbon lid with acis liner.






Granted it currently has the steel grill on not titanium(I have the titanium grill on my cheap ayrtek, which the fitment is perfectly on it) but fitment is same either way

Try swapping the mounting points on the Raw and the other one mate, worked for me!
Logged

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14749
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #152 on: August 11, 2014, 05:45:24 PM »

the plastic shell is thicker than a carbon fibre shell but both use the same length bolts so you will see a small gap between them on the carbon shelled models.
Logged

the little ripper

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 264
  • Trade Count: (0)
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #155 on: August 11, 2014, 07:17:41 PM »

LOL at the content of that masuri press release. Guess they have to get their money's worth if they employ a sports PR agency
Logged

ItsJustCricket

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3698
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • Its Just Cricket
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #156 on: August 11, 2014, 07:20:48 PM »

We've had a recent flurry of Masuri VS Elite helmet sales.  It can't be a coincidence, surely!

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #157 on: August 11, 2014, 07:26:00 PM »

LOL at the content of that masuri press release. Guess they have to get their money's worth if they employ a sports PR agency

let's hope nobody gets hit in the face wearing their helmets. I know which helmet I would wear and it's not a Masuri.
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

fasteddie

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1507
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Straight up.
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #159 on: August 11, 2014, 07:51:20 PM »

LOL at the content of that masuri press release. Guess they have to get their money's worth if they employ a sports PR agency

If you are assuming the PR firm are spinning, then I feel you may be misguided.

The PR team have simply laid out the facts as they are. Ayrtek didn't do that, they simply gave us a short passage.

Masuri are explaining their piece. Your criticism is frankly wrong and shows a lack of understanding in corporate communications.
Logged

Kevtheplumber

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 232
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • K Fisk Plumbing & Heating Ltd
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #160 on: August 11, 2014, 07:54:37 PM »

Biggest issue I've had is fit, I've had to sew two lots of inners together to stop it wobbling about, my head isn't that small and other helmets have fitted more snug with just a standard inner. But I do think it is more sturdy and certainly have more faith in it, but I do think an option for fit between a junior and senior helmet needs addressing
Logged
Twitter @kfiskplumbing
           @KimboltonCC

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #161 on: August 11, 2014, 07:54:55 PM »

Van i be honest and say i am disappointed in ayrteks statement.
I know they have to investigate and what not, but surely it wasn't just me expecting more?
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

i12breakfree

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2291
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #162 on: August 11, 2014, 08:15:36 PM »

Van i be honest and say i am disappointed in ayrteks statement.
I know they have to investigate and what not, but surely it wasn't just me expecting more?



i guess they have to really careful with what they come up as part of the press release
With Masuri running its PR and articles like this telegraph one - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/international/england/11024926/England-v-India-Stuart-Broad-cleared-to-play-Oval-Test-despite-broken-nose.html
Adidas/Ayrtek has to be cautious. i am sure any statement that needs to go to the press will have multiple approval cycles
And again without getting to the root of this they will not be able to release it
If it was a product defect then do they need to do a safety recall ?
Logged

Bruce

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1765
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #163 on: August 11, 2014, 08:28:42 PM »

Yet Masuri still have the majority of county players (Kieswetter included) in their old "Elite" model.
Logged
You're only as good as your last knock....
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 31
 

Advertise on CBF