the stuart broad incident
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 31

Author Topic: the stuart broad incident  (Read 96043 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Montys Beard

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 280
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #315 on: August 19, 2014, 12:04:46 AM »

We're famous!

https://www.facebook.com/lekkaww/posts/10204621464205410

Personally after being hit on the grill twice with my Ayrtek I wouldn't look elsewhere - yes this incident is unfortunate but hopefully Tom will be able to bounce back from this and get Broad back in an Ayrtek for the next series, I've tried on the double bar Masuri and seriously can't understand why someone would choose it over an Ayrtek - the vision and weight is awful compared!

Yep, he's mentioned the forum three times in as many days, including a wonderfully cryptic message to us all....

Logged
"The aim of English cricket is, in fact, mainly to beat Australia" - Jim Laker
@LiamGarratt

plumb111

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • High Score 110* Bowling - 6/22
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #316 on: August 19, 2014, 08:26:09 AM »

whats his issue ? Surely he would be better off trying to make friends with people on here instead of mouthing off about cbf members ?

clearly gutted everyones not snapping up his equipment
Logged
Why do we put ourselves through it ?

The Palmist

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1695
  • Trade Count: (+15)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #317 on: August 19, 2014, 08:27:36 AM »

including a wonderfully cryptic message to us all....

errm talk about yourself mate, he clearly says "Most" and not "All"

JK  :D :D :D
Logged

Cowcorner

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 334
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #318 on: August 19, 2014, 09:48:11 PM »

Chad,  there is another setting where the ball can get through.  On the bottom row of holes,  second hole from the back.  Nick's helmet at the cbf day was set like this and we noticed that the gap was big enough for a ball to get through.



Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk


Surely all three of the bottom holes will let the ball through - if not then the one to the right definitely will, if the centre one does. I hope that's made sense?
I might have to try all the settings on my Ayrtek to see if that's correct, unless somebody else already has?
Logged
There is, of course, a world of difference between cricket and the movie business . . . I suppose doing a love scene with Raquel Welch roughly corresponds to scoring a century before lunch. - Oliver Reed

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #319 on: August 19, 2014, 10:06:58 PM »


Surely all three of the bottom holes will let the ball through - if not then the one to the right definitely will, if the centre one does. I hope that's made sense?
I might have to try all the settings on my Ayrtek to see if that's correct, unless somebody else already has?
It's not quite that straightforward. I use the rearmost hole on the bottom in that picture and there is no way the ball is getting through. The shape of the front mount is such that you get a variation on gap size as it isn't a flat line.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Logged

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

TangoWhiskey

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1629
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Review that.
Logged

Optical

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #322 on: August 20, 2014, 09:05:01 AM »

It was 'deal of the day' yesterday @ £45. Gone back up now.
Logged

TangoWhiskey

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1629
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Review that.
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #323 on: August 20, 2014, 09:06:24 AM »

Oh, fair enough!
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #324 on: August 20, 2014, 09:08:52 AM »

That confused me as well! £10 off!  :(
But £45 would be a bargain!
Logged

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #325 on: August 20, 2014, 09:19:00 AM »

Well we learn something new everyday. Deal of the Day lasts until the following morning when somebody gets into the office and changes it  :D - and probably starts at the same time!
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

TangoWhiskey

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1629
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Review that.
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #326 on: September 07, 2014, 08:06:31 PM »

Did I miss the press release about this? Has anything been said?
Logged

mattcoll12491

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Needs Willow-holics annonymous
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #327 on: September 07, 2014, 10:36:53 PM »

Logged
Left-Arm Curious

TangoWhiskey

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1629
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Review that.
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #328 on: September 08, 2014, 08:10:36 AM »

http://www.ayrtek.com/stuart-broad-injury-press-release/


That's not an explanation for what happened though. I want to know the results of the finding. Was it just an already damaged helmet or did the top edge expose a flaw which was previously untested?
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: the stuart broad incident
« Reply #329 on: September 08, 2014, 08:27:27 AM »

That's not an explanation for what happened though. I want to know the results of the finding. Was it just an already damaged helmet or did the top edge expose a flaw which was previously untested?

Disclaimer: This is not an Ayrtek explanation, and is purely anecdotal

If you look at one of the other pages in this topic, we discovered that on certain settings of the grille, the gap is such that the ball can fit through between the peak and the grille relatively easily (i.e. you can push it through by hand). Looking at the settings that Broad was using (in the pictures of the event), it looks like this is what happened. This also is the widest gap in terms of vision, that the Ayrtek settings allow. You can see the result in the first picture below, and also an indication of another setting where we found the gap large enough for the ball to pass through in the second picture.



and

« Last Edit: September 08, 2014, 08:29:01 AM by tim2000s »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 31
 

Advertise on CBF