Topic: Big bash 2015 (Read 58187 times)

csnew · « **Reply #300 on:** January 17, 2015, 11:02:35 AM »

Quote from: Come in 5 and left a bit on January 17, 2015, 10:57:04 AM

Don't think he qualifies anymore... Maybe him, and the other unwanteds should all team up.

Probably could make a decent line up of players not playing in the WC.
KP, bravo, pollard, lumb, zampa, vijay, gul, pattinson etc

skip1973 · « **Reply #301 on:** January 17, 2015, 11:35:22 AM »

Thoughts on KP's new tattoo?

Come in 5 and left a bit · « **Reply #302 on:** January 17, 2015, 12:01:36 PM »

Not with using bad words. It's a bit pretentious I think and I like a tattoo

ProCricketer1982 · « **Reply #303 on:** January 17, 2015, 02:55:06 PM »

no one mentioned KP bowled as well!!! Who needs Moeen...

wcc · « **Reply #304 on:** January 17, 2015, 03:22:32 PM »

Quote from: Come in 5 and left a bit on January 17, 2015, 12:01:36 PM

Not with using bad words. It's a bit pretentious I think and I like a tattoo

Pretentious is KP in a nutshell!

Sam · « **Reply #305 on:** January 17, 2015, 03:36:18 PM »

Actually starting to think that catch may have been out as the catch was not the fielders first touch in the process of making the catch.

smilley792 · « **Reply #306 on:** January 17, 2015, 03:51:45 PM »

Pretty sure we had this convo previously sam regarding a new Zealand catch of similar controversy.

Got to love the kp saga. Does matter what he does or says or wears or promotes. It's bad if your a bit kp and good if your pro kp.

Either way his batting is a talent and returning to near what he was. On talent he should be in the england side. It's a shame what went before has. As he never will get another shot.

ProCricketer1982 · « **Reply #307 on:** January 17, 2015, 03:53:57 PM »

There was talk about how disjointed the BlastT20 is, meaning as he wasn't (a different debate of course!) playing one day/LVCC stuff.. he was playing once a week at the most.. Anyone would struggle for form.. This is sort of proving if he's playing regularly, he's still got it.

smilley792 · « **Reply #308 on:** January 17, 2015, 03:59:21 PM »

Quote from: ProCricketer1982 on January 17, 2015, 03:53:57 PM

There was talk about how disjointed the BlastT20 is, meaning as he wasn't (a different debate of course!) playing one day/LVCC stuff.. he was playing once a week at the most.. Anyone would struggle for form.. This is sort of proving if he's playing regularly, he's still got it.

He claims.that the blast and ipl were poor because his knee was done and he shouldn't have played.

He said he's done nothing since. Just let his knee recover. And apparently this is the result

ProCricketer1982 · « **Reply #309 on:** January 17, 2015, 04:01:59 PM »

Quote from: smilley792 on January 17, 2015, 03:59:21 PM

He claims.that the blast and ipl were poor because his knee was done and he shouldn't have played.

He said he's done nothing since. Just let his knee recover. And apparently this is the result

yeah, I do remember hearing that. I just meant that on todays commentary it was mentioned about the disjointed Blast etc. Which, basing it off what they say, I can sort of see that it might have an impact at least.

ProCricketer1982 · « **Reply #310 on:** January 17, 2015, 04:14:34 PM »

Just saw the catch. he throws it while in, but then leaps from outside the ground to take it.. then lands inside..

To me, that's Not Out as I thought your last movement to catch it had to be from inside the rope..... please someone with the rules correct this if I'm wrong.. as it stands.. I'd be fuming that the fielder cheated at this point.

wilkie113 · « **Reply #311 on:** January 17, 2015, 04:45:32 PM »

If we don't know the rules, then the players probably don't. How on earth has he cheated? He's took a catch and appealed!!

ProCricketer1982 · « **Reply #312 on:** January 17, 2015, 04:52:27 PM »

Quote from: wilkie113 on January 17, 2015, 04:45:32 PM

If we don't know the rules, then the players probably don't. How on earth has he cheated? He's took a catch and appealed!!

personally I thought I did know the rule. So IF I somehow managed to do that I'd know it wasn't out (trying to read up on the laws now tbh).. I do get yoru point though and on a amateur cricket field I agree.. On a pro field though, I expect pro's to know the laws, they are paid well enough to.

just my 2p's worth, if you don't agree fair enough.

Sam · « **Reply #313 on:** January 17, 2015, 05:03:14 PM »

Quote from: smilley792 on January 17, 2015, 03:51:45 PM

Pretty sure we had this convo previously sam regarding a new Zealand catch of similar controversy.

Don't quite remember that one mate

.

@ProCricketer1982 Problem there I guess comes when the laws themselves aren't that clear and can be interpreted in different ways. Following in case anyone wants to try :

Quote

4. Ball beyond the boundary
After it has crossed the boundary in the air, a ball may be caught, subject to the
provisions of Law 32, or fielded provided that
(i) the first contact with the ball is by a fielder, not touching or grounded
beyond the boundary, who has some part of his person grounded
within the boundary or whose final contact with the ground before
touching the ball was entirely within the boundary.
Any fielder subsequently touching the ball is not subject to this
restriction.
. (ii) neither the ball, nor any fielder in contact with the ball touches, or is
grounded beyond, the boundary at any time during the act of making
the catch or of fielding the ball.
The act of making the catch, or of fielding the ball, shall start from the time when
the ball first comes into contact with some part of a fielder�s person and shall end
when a fielder obtains complete control both over the ball and over his own
movement.

...

a catch shall be considered to be fair if :

(e) a fielder catches the ball after it has crossed the boundary in the air, provided that after being struck by the bat, the first contact with the ball is by a fielder, not touching or grounded beyond the boundary, who has some part of his person grounded within the boundary or whose final contact with the ground before touching the ball was entirely within the boundary.

Any fielder subsequently touching the ball is not subject to this restriction. See Law 19.4 (Ball beyond the boundary) (Which is the above bit).

uknsaunders · « **Reply #314 on:** January 17, 2015, 05:04:06 PM »

You learn something new every day, apart from the umpires lol

The more kp bats like that the more I think the ecb are a disgrace. Even broad of all people has said kp should of been dropped and it was all a bit heavy handed. This is definitely a Moore's, Cook, Downton thing.

Author Topic: Big bash 2015 (Read 58187 times)

csnew

Re: Big bash 2015

skip1973

Re: Big bash 2015

Come in 5 and left a bit

Re: Big bash 2015

ProCricketer1982

Re: Big bash 2015

wcc

Re: Big bash 2015

Sam

Re: Big bash 2015

smilley792

Re: Big bash 2015

ProCricketer1982

Re: Big bash 2015

smilley792

Re: Big bash 2015

ProCricketer1982

Re: Big bash 2015

ProCricketer1982

Re: Big bash 2015

wilkie113

Re: Big bash 2015

ProCricketer1982

Re: Big bash 2015

Sam

Re: Big bash 2015

uknsaunders

Re: Big bash 2015