Print

[procricket]

Well it simple it would be a extra 3mm all over because for ever 10 density you can either go down 1oz in weight up up 1mm all over the bat so

2-9 would be 41mm and 70mm spine and although the cad doesn't reay show there no concaving

[qasim_aziz99]

2-9 would be 41mm and 70mm spine and although the cad doesn't reay show there no concaving

That'd make everyone envious on here

[procricket]

Too heavy for me I like light bats

[uknsaunders]

The most effective profile I found were the jumbo profile, but the pickup can be a little bottom heavy and the gm icon, my match bat of the last two years.

[procricket]

@uknsaunders

How about this for you

[uknsaunders]

Think if the edge profile was a bit smoother/curved it wouldn't be far off. What's the edge size?

[smilley792]

That one looks like a kook menace!

I really like the tonto.  Just don't need another bat. .....

[procricket]

It looks bloody ugly but each to there own

[Boondougal]

@uknsaunders

How about this for you

That in G3 or butterfly ... A bat that ugly might be the only thing that makes my technique look pretty.

[FattusCattus]

The most effective profile I found were the jumbo profile, but the pickup can be a little bottom heavy and the gm icon, my match bat of the last two years.

If someone could recreate the true Jumbo profile, I would buy one in a heartbeat.

Not sure if anyone can / is allowed to.

(although now I think of it, Dukes did for a while)

[FattusCattus]

@uknsaunders

How about this for you

Now this shape with a Jumbo style nocxh out of the top, less of a duck-bill toe, smaller edges and no concaving would be interesting!

[InternalTraining]

That one looks like a kook menace!

I really like the tonto.  Just don't need another bat. .....

Yup, looks like a kook I once saw, it was heavy.

[KIPPERS]

I know this sounds silly but do you also design bats for batsmen who actually middle the ball.

[procricket]

Well the bats i design so far i know 100 have been scored with some of my designs

Middle the ball intresting though thats the equation i design for bigger coverage yes it funny most ameature cricketers middle the ball 3 in 10 so i design shapes like the kalimarr if you look at is designed for coverage yet in a light weight.

I say to people use a bat with a higher middle give it a try you will be suprised of the coverage.

You say middle but thats the beauty everybody middle is different. If you look at the 1271 that is one big middle it designed for off centre shots.

All me designs are there to enhance coverage not just a same condest spot.

The ugly bat above was not my design.

But all my experiance comes from using mate and i leave tehcnical stuff to streaky i test and i like to think i know what designs work and what dont. 

[Neon Cricket]

I say to people use a bat with a higher middle give it a try you will be suprised of the coverage.

Totally agree with this - I always used a lower middle thinking that was the best option for the "slow and low wickets", switched to a high middled bat at the start of last year (on my bat makers recommendation) and it's honestly changed my batting altogether, you'll be amazed how much easier it is to use a high middled bat compared to a low middle