Print

[mad_abt_cricket]

Thought to post some pictures of a slightly different profile. Tried to gain a big profile with some concaving with weight at 2.7 without binding/ grips.

[uknsaunders]

Looks big, what specs did you end up with. Photography great as ever and the bat isn't too shabby either!

[jwebber86]

very nice shape. must be a light cleft to get so much wood in the profile

[mad_abt_cricket]

 Thanks. Just completed the binding, this bat will end up between 2.9 and 2.10.

[mad_abt_cricket]

very nice shape. must be a light cleft to get so much wood in the profile

To be honest, it's the magic of concaving. Probably the first time, I have tried it.
It does give a big profile to a bat.

[Boondougal]

very interesting shape... definitely plenty of wood where the ball should be hitting! Top job.

[uknsaunders]

So what edge and spine size is it? How much concaving?

[InternalTraining]

Lovely bat! What are the edge and spine size?

[mad_abt_cricket]

37 mm edge / 65 mm spine.

[Northern monkey]

Far from a fan of the duckbill style,(the wickets I play on are very low bounce), but that is just lovely
It looks like it tapers up slightly towards the bottom
Very very nice

[peristocle]

Looks great

[tejasapatel]

Nice work there. Great to see pictures of the bat throughout the making process.

[i12breakfree]

Love the pics. Not sure if the sharp tapering of spine in the end will become a weak point for the bat. Again just a thought, as a batmaker would be interesting to get your insight.

[mad_abt_cricket]

As long as the toe has a decent thickness and is knocked in well, it shouldn't be a problem.