Was it a league umpire or one of the oppositions?
technically it should be a leagues umpire which was the case for the past seasons; funnily enough we didn't know that due to the opposition had full rights of the ground they had the right to bring in their own umpire.
which to us made it look as if it was a match fix but to the authority here they said it was the case of poor umpiring aka lack of knowledge? which doesn't make sense as these umpires are well trained by the acc?
anyways; long story short they decided to revoke the decision & have sent them through the finals.
in my personal option; the committee is just blinded by the opposition having their own ground as here we have 5 grounds which one of them they have full rights too..
...funny how they say cricket is a gentleman's game but it wasn't played in that fashion last sunday..really disappointed.