Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review  (Read 3589 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chad

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 3010
  • Trade Count: (+22)
Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« on: January 07, 2016, 11:38:30 PM »

Right, so next one up! (Will be a fair few of these in the coming days!)

A Phantom Shadow Players Edition, bought from Maverick79 on here. Had an interest in Phantom when they first came out, I wasn't too keen on the 'Mask' logo, but I think it eventually grew on me. Here are some pics!




















Specs:
Weight: 2lb 10.2oz with scuff and single grip
Edges - around 38-40mm pre-rounding IIRC. Around 34-35mm now.
Spine - Calculated to be around 67mm before knocking
Shoulder Edge- Around 10mm after rounding
Toe Edge- Around 13mm after rounding
Toe - 24mm
Handle - Oval
Concaving - Minimal and throughout the blade

Purely based on dimensions, this bat seems to be a bit of a beast! The profile reminded me a lot of the Uzi Sports Black Mamba LE profile, which is lovely. The nice flowing spine and edges, with the spine running down to the toe and a gentle concaving throughout – all these result in a profile which is very easy on the eye. The face is (was) a flat face, which many people like, but I still haven't made up my mind on which I like yet. (I think I personally tend towards a slight rounding, sort of the 4.5mm that GM offer) The pick up is good, probably a solid 2/3 based on the GM pick up Index. There is a bit of a bow present, but nothing drastic. One bad point I have about the size features is actually the width of the bat, the bat starts with a width of around 106mm at the toe, and then tapers down to 104mm at the shoulder. Probably done just to keep the weight down a touch, and I agree that you should probably be hitting the centre anyways, but I like to make use of the entire blade, so a 106 - 108mm width throughout would have been nice!

This offering from Phantom is the 'performance' grade, basically just the uglier ones which perform well. However, when I had a tap up with the mallet and ball, it was safe to say I was underwhelmed at this bat. It just felt very 'planky', with a high pitch upon impact, and it didn't seem to respond too well. I actually believe it was just because it hadn't been pressed nearly enough, as you can see that the edges had to be rounded almost 5mm! After knocking for a bit, the bat seemed to respond a bit better, but I still wasn't too convinced by it. Then out came the LV mallet, and I patiently knocked it in for a couple of weeks, and rounded the edges even more. End result is that the pitch is still pretty high, but having owned a fair few bats, I think that's probably purely down to the significant presence of heartwood. The response has certainly improved significantly, which is why I feel that the bat may have been underpressed.

In terms of looks, the first impressions were that the willow wasn't the nicest, but wasn't too ugly, there's something odd about having a couple of grains that are very defined, then some which are very faint. The finishing is excellent, as are the stickers. They do seem to look nicer in the flesh, although I agree that the front sticker does look similar Affinity, there are some subtle differences. The chrome and texturing is lovely, and really does make that extra bit of difference.

So in conclusion, a lovely product, and although it is sort of a 'premium' range, the prices are reasonable. Although the bat felt underpressed, I must stress that this may be a one off, as IJC seem to rate these very highly and I trust their judgement on these. As with anything new, I was probably a bit harsher and sceptical than I normally am! However I do find it a bit odd that this was graded as a ‘performance’ grade, as I don’t know if anyone could tell that a bat was definitely going to get better, and based on initial tap up, I would have avoided it in a shop! Then again, one of the greatest podshavers based his grading purely on performance, so who am I to say it’s wrong!

TLDR; Couple of issues, but nothing major and a cracking product. 
Logged

bostoncricketer

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2016, 12:49:38 AM »

Thanks for another great review! I would just given up on the bat after a couple of hours :) The shape looked similar to B3 Mullanator to me on the first look, although the Mull obviously has a much larger spine.

Then again, one of the greatest podshavers based his grading purely on performance, so who am I to say it’s wrong!
Who makes these ??
Logged

WalkingWicket37

Re: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2016, 09:20:07 AM »

Who makes these ??

Have a ThinK about which highly regarded bat maker is based in Sussex and you will know.
We don't TalK about these things directly, just in riddles  ;)
Logged

Six Sixes Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4335
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Six Sixes Cricket Ltd
Re: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2016, 10:28:45 AM »

Have a ThinK about which highly regarded bat maker is based in Sussex and you will know.
We don't TalK about these things directly, just in riddles  ;)
Think Chadders is on about JM

Northern monkey

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3657
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2016, 10:45:24 AM »

I used one of these last year, thanks to Simon May kindly lending me his, and to be honest, for the money, it was a lovely bat.
My only criticism of his bat, was it was lacking a little bit lower down, the main hitting area had a really nice middle on it and made a lovely noise.
Pick up and balance were spot on

kal_m

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2016, 12:16:10 PM »

I bought the whole range from Simon (Dark Edition, Illusion and Shadow). Have used the Dark Edition towards the tail end of the last season and it was absolutely amazing. Haven't used the other two but they should perform very well too.
Logged
Aspire and Achieve

Chad

Re: Phantom Shadow Players Edition Review
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2016, 05:12:50 PM »

I believe that the same batmaker used by Newbery makes these bats, although as d7bow said, the batmaker I was referring to was Julian Millichamp in that comment about performance grading! Thing about Julian that's different from everyone else was that he graded by performance across the WHOLE range, not just the ugly ones, so there was consistency in his grading. It's a real shame that he's retired now without having the opportunity to run his academy, but he's almost certainly been a huge inspiration to many podshavers around today. :)
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF