Evening all
It's Saturday night, so while most people are on the booze and getting ready for a night out I'm playing with my bats!
As most of the regulars on here will have seen, I had B3 map SimonMay5's Screaming cat that I fell in love with. I also bought a Chase off eBay for a very good price considering it was barely used. I couldn't help but notice the similarities between the two while they were side my side.
Other than the obvious concaving (none vs. Minimal) the shapes are almost identical. The B3s swell extends slightly further down the blade than the Chase, while the Chase has a very subtle bow compared to the dead straight B3 which has an angled handle to create the same effect.
I'm not sure when Simon's Scat would have been made, but the Chase is around 10 years old and I'm guessing if would have been a similar time. This was obviously before the big edge craze took over, but it goes to show that this shape works well. Both bats have good coverage with wood in the right places. This results in a nice long hitting area and both bats tap up just as well as any big edged bat I have recently owned.
What was the point of all this waffle? I feel these bats unscientifically prove that big edges may look nice, but what really makes a bat perform well is coverage. You try to hit the ball out the middle of the bat, both these bats have a lot of wood there giving an extended sweet spot. Because of the full shapes and having wood in the right places you get value for your shots that may not be so present on a heavily concaved bat.