yes saw this the other night...a little bit surprised to be honest. The debate over whether Balance has made any technical changes(yes I know it's runs that count but everyone seems to be talking about it) goes on.It's runs in the book in my opinion that count.....
Athers said only minor changes have been made by him, getting weight into the ball,rather than hanging back. If you say that's something decent players should do anyway-there's no real change?
anyway, Vince the 'experts' think should be in, so do I...for the time being-instead of Balance.
What surprised me was Athers picking Bell.....i'm a Bell fan and I don't think his career is over but.....is Balance or Vince more deserving, they are younger and will improve...Bell has 22 test tons, you don't get those in the corner shop... interesting
And Compdog is in no-ones team? what's the dude done wrong this time? he's an old fashioned player, technically and mentally, is that out of place with current Test Cricket ? is that is?