Borthwick to surrey
Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Author Topic: Borthwick to surrey  (Read 10156 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

alexhilly1492

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 3121
  • Trade Count: (0)
Borthwick to surrey
« on: September 13, 2016, 11:42:12 AM »

Another big player for Durham leaves, turned down a new 3 year deal and moved down south,

Surrey seem to be building a big squad unless there's going to be a few leaving this winter
Logged
HS: 77*, 73*, 61*, 61*, 54*, 50*
BB: 7-4-9-5, 7.3-0-29-5

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12714
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2016, 11:56:07 AM »

There will have to be a few leavers from Surrey.
Davies is due to move to Somerset.

The Surrey top order next year will be mad
Burns
Stoneman
Borthwick
Sanga (expecting him to stay on)
Roy
Foakes
Ansari
Curran S
Curran T
Batty
Footitt, Meaker, Durnbach,

Plus loads of others. Sibley, the new spinner, Burke the alrounder... And a brilliant youth set up.

Personally I am not sure buying all these players in is necessary...
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2016, 12:10:38 PM »

One mitigating factor will be potential England call-ups (Roy, Foakes, Currans, Ansari, Meaker), and making sure they're aren't hit too hard.

Logged

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3294
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2016, 12:55:42 PM »

Will be no one left for anyone else. Feel sorry for Durham, will end up in mid div 2 unless they have loads of youths coming through.

Is there still a wages cap? Surely Surrey must be well past that with the names they have
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2016, 01:23:45 PM »

Surrey still have the cheque book Charlie mentality brought in by Chris Adams who mistakenly thought he was the Alex Ferguson of the cricket world.

up the middle....sex

 :)
Logged

Cow_corner

  • Guest
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2016, 02:00:45 PM »

Probably persuaded to go due to massive debts brought on by the soulless riverside. If Mark Wood doesn't get a central contract he's out of the door too I imagine.
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2016, 02:11:25 PM »

Surrey still have the cheque book Charlie mentality brought in by Chris Adams who mistakenly thought he was the Alex Ferguson of the cricket world.

It's amazing really, you have some counties struggling to operate due to limited finances, then Surrey who just their money at stuff. Maybe a franchise system is the way forward
Logged

Churchy1989

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1525
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2016, 02:28:52 PM »

Somthing special happening at Surrey!

Just checking the annual memberships now, only 15 mins form work  :o
Logged
Insta / Twitter @Church_Cricket

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2016, 02:37:09 PM »

Somthing special happening at Surrey!

Just checking the annual memberships now, only 15 mins form work  :o

£150 for t20s and one day
£200 for county champs right?

friend was looking the other day

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2016, 02:38:17 PM »

It's amazing really, you have some counties struggling to operate due to limited finances, then Surrey who just their money at stuff. Maybe a franchise system is the way forward

Surrey is the only County who don't care Jade Dernbach earns 50k a year, it's like the crumbs off the cake
Logged

rickjames

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5097
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2016, 02:47:38 PM »

I pay £147 for my T20/One Day membership.

We're rich, do what we want and all that. Ah. And its not like we've sacked the academy off; Pope and Virdi recently signed their first pro deals
Logged

Cow_corner

  • Guest
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2016, 02:49:32 PM »

So Div 4 football or whatever they call it now wages?
« Last Edit: September 13, 2016, 02:52:29 PM by Cow_corner »
Logged

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2016, 04:08:12 PM »

To be fair to Surrey, they have had a concerted youth policy for a number of seasons now and a lot of their squad is homegrown. As I mentioned above, it's now that those players who are interesting the selectors and justify Surrey looking for players of a certain quality to keep themselves in Div 1 and look to win it.

Marketing wise, Surrey are also the slickest county. Their embrace of T20, making it a roaring success it not to be sniffed at. They are getting people through the gates both in terms of club and country.

It's easy to bag Surrey, but they are profitable, grow their own, and look to support Team England. Compare them to Yorkshire, who whinge in public about having England players, when in reality their central contracts help keep the club solvent, and up until this season seem to be whote ball averse, and can't sell out their Test matches in a catchment area that holds the largest number of participating cricketers in the country.

Also, in defence of Dernbach, in county cricket, especially one day stuff, he is a bloody good bowler.

Logged

jamesisapayne

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1111
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Best bowling: 8-3-15-6 Best batting: 111
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2016, 05:43:27 PM »

Compare them to Yorkshire, who whinge in public about having England players, when in reality their central contracts help keep the club solvent, and up until this season seem to be whote ball averse, and can't sell out their Test matches in a catchment area that holds the largest number of participating cricketers in the country.

Yorshire? Whingers? Noooooo, never  ;)
Logged

ScottParko

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Borthwick to surrey
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2016, 06:28:07 AM »

To be fair to Surrey, they have had a concerted youth policy for a number of seasons now and a lot of their squad is homegrown. As I mentioned above, it's now that those players who are interesting the selectors and justify Surrey looking for players of a certain quality to keep themselves in Div 1 and look to win it.

Marketing wise, Surrey are also the slickest county. Their embrace of T20, making it a roaring success it not to be sniffed at. They are getting people through the gates both in terms of club and country.

It's easy to bag Surrey, but they are profitable, grow their own, and look to support Team England. Compare them to Yorkshire, who whinge in public about having England players, when in reality their central contracts help keep the club solvent, and up until this season seem to be whote ball averse, and can't sell out their Test matches in a catchment area that holds the largest number of participating cricketers in the country.

Also, in defence of Dernbach, in county cricket, especially one day stuff, he is a bloody good bowler.

Not sure how I feel about the Surrey grow their own statement. There was a lot of grumbles at the start of the season when they signed 25 year old South African Pillans and 18 year old South African McKerr
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
 

Advertise on CBF