Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 102 103 [104] 105 106 ... 122

Author Topic: India v England Test Series  (Read 204611 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1545 on: December 16, 2016, 11:01:25 AM »

England cant do without him Felix, and you must know that too  :)

what position he bats, he been up and down like I dunno what, has still not been sorted.

he should be down at 7 or 8 IMHO to be most useful for us, plus his bowling

neither is front line batting or bowling but put together he's invaluable.


Logged

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1546 on: December 16, 2016, 11:37:23 AM »

Moeen's stats are pretty irrelevant. Normally hides at number 7. In this series the only times he scored big runs was on the two flat roads in Rajkot and Madras.

The 3rd player to score 1000 runs and get 30 wickets in a year... But he's irrelevant. Dumb people are dumb.

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1547 on: December 16, 2016, 11:46:31 AM »

You say not frontline but specialist number six/seven is a frontline role and he performs that very well - he just should not bat any higher in non-Asian conditions.  He has five Test centuries now - thats more than Mark Ramprakash or Graeme Hick, both supposedly front line batsmen, even managed....give him a little bit of credit, eh?
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1548 on: December 16, 2016, 11:59:26 AM »

You say not frontline but specialist number six/seven is a frontline role and he performs that very well - he just should not bat any higher in non-Asian conditions.  He has five Test centuries now - thats more than Mark Ramprakash or Graeme Hick, both supposedly front line batsmen, even managed....give him a little bit of credit, eh?

see your point, from memory both ramps and hick batted 3,4 6 and 7 for England

back in the day we played 7 specialists...because we didn't have any all rounders

and please no one say Chris Lewis and defreitas, Derek Pringle were genuine all rounders seniorplayer will burst a blood vessel   :) :)

hahahahahahahhaha
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1549 on: December 16, 2016, 12:18:30 PM »

see your point, from memory both ramps and hick batted 3,4 6 and 7 for England

back in the day we played 7 specialists...because we didn't have any all rounders

and please no one say Chris Lewis and defreitas, Derek Pringle were genuine all rounders seniorplayer will burst a blood vessel   :) :)

hahahahahahahhaha

maybe not them but gough and cork were surely genuine all rounders??
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1550 on: December 16, 2016, 12:24:18 PM »

You forget thwir batting average didnt exceed 20!

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1551 on: December 16, 2016, 12:30:24 PM »

You forget thwir batting average didnt exceed 20!

whats in averages

if you take a wicket or hit 1 50 your an all rounder in my book

one of the best test allrounders was Gillespie not many get double hundreds and 100 wickets
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1552 on: December 16, 2016, 12:30:28 PM »

In fairness, you could argue that Alec Stewart was a pretty class all rounder.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1553 on: December 16, 2016, 12:32:14 PM »

whats in averages

if you take a wicket or hit 1 50 your an all rounder in my book

one of the best test allrounders was Gillespie not many get double hundreds and 100 wickets

So we play with an all rounder at the top of the innings in cook and at the bottom with anderson :D give me strength

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1554 on: December 16, 2016, 12:41:18 PM »

So we play with an all rounder at the top of the innings in cook and at the bottom with anderson :D give me strength

yep fine by me

cook should bowl more as looked threatening and please don't tell me you think the burnley lara is not a genuine top 6 being kept low by unrivalled talent above him?
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1555 on: December 16, 2016, 12:50:32 PM »

You're a proper all-rounder if your batting average is higher than your bowling average, so they say. Joe Root has the highest bowling average that is still lower than batting average in test history, so he's the worst all-rounder ever?
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

Felix Tito

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 860
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • West Country is best
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1556 on: December 16, 2016, 01:37:36 PM »

The 3rd player to score 1000 runs and get 30 wickets in a year... But he's irrelevant. Dumb people are dumb.
30 wickets at 50. Sensational stuff  ;)
Logged

richthekeeper

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1557 on: December 16, 2016, 02:01:55 PM »

Darren Gough an all-rounder? do me a favour!
Logged

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1558 on: December 16, 2016, 02:17:28 PM »

30 wickets at 50. Sensational stuff  ;)

Would rather him get wickets than not at all, if he wasnt taking wickets we would all be calling for him to be dropped as a bowler and considered soley as a batsman.

brokenbat

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2319
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: India v England Test Series
« Reply #1559 on: December 16, 2016, 02:33:19 PM »

Moeen's stats are pretty irrelevant. Normally hides at number 7. In this series the only times he scored big runs was on the two flat roads in Rajkot and Madras.

so, Younis Khan sucks, Moeen sucks, everyone sucks. Do you not get hugged enough in life?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 102 103 [104] 105 106 ... 122
 

Advertise on CBF