Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands  (Read 6358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2016, 07:29:25 PM »
Quote from: ElPerro on November 14, 2016, 07:08:47 PM
Gary Ballance?

Currently in the side!  ;)
Logged

GoodLeave

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1062
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2016, 07:29:49 PM »
That's odd. I don't remember Adidas calling me...
Logged

GoodLeave

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1062
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2016, 07:33:51 PM »
According to Wikipedia, Adidas sponsor Yogibear.

Wouldn't have called him "Test-Match Standard" though...
Logged

springbok45

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 344
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2016, 09:55:14 PM »
Quote from: WalkingWicket37 on November 14, 2016, 07:29:25 PM
Currently in the side!  ;)

Woakes or Bairstow
Logged

ca_gold

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2016, 01:04:45 PM »
I think the point of the article was to reiterate their philosophy/ethos/vision/mission/mantra about why they stock the brands that they do in an indirect way. Which going by all that logic, begs the question, why not stock H4L?

 :D
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Cricket - Graveyard of major sports brands
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2016, 03:14:51 PM »
Quote from: ca_gold on November 15, 2016, 01:04:45 PM
I think the point of the article was to reiterate their philosophy/ethos/vision/mission/mantra about why they stock the brands that they do in an indirect way. Which going by all that logic, begs the question, why not stock H4L?

 :D

Maybe the question should be why will H4L not supply IJC  ;)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF