What level of protection do we really need?
Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: What level of protection do we really need?  (Read 6993 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

19reading87

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7079
  • Trade Count: (+39)
What level of protection do we really need?
« on: November 18, 2016, 11:49:40 AM »

I'm not sure if many of you had ever noticed, but I like buying pads... expensive ones at that. They always have to be top top level pads too! "Test level" protection.

Now, a question for you all? What level of protection pads and gloves do you really need? Regardless of cost and looks, does the standard you play at warrant the standard of softs you own?

For me, to answer my own question is gloves, yes! For me I'll always buy the highest level of gloves as it's so easy to break a digit whilst batting no matter how fast the ball is coming at you so make sure you have good protection on them.

Pads, I'm starting to question this....

Would be good to know what level of softs you actually use, and what you should probably use.

Reds
« Last Edit: November 18, 2016, 11:52:14 AM by 19reading87 »
Logged
Highest score: 147*          Best bowling: 6-20

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2016, 12:03:15 PM »

Gloves wise im with you

I only buy gloves with inserts as even the "test" ones are just soft foam so I'm not overly confident in them. I have been teased by Dean he is bringing the protective gloves back so may stock up

pad wise I don't care about protection as much as comfort really as im sure most club/first class level pads would be more than protective enough but saying that I have purchased a pair of GN legend pads from Vitas which are top end but only as have been told they are extremely comfy
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2016, 12:09:39 PM »

Gloves I always go for the highest level of protection available, "Test Standard" as I've broken fingers a couple of times.
I like Sausage fingers where possible, as I feel they offer better protection than splits.

As for pads I usually go for a higher end so I look sponsored because they're made of higher quality materials they tend to last longer (ha, like that bothers  me) and feel more comfortable.
Logged

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2016, 12:11:11 PM »

I tend to go for comfort and fit, and the best value overall.
Logged

SteffanLangholz

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 523
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Teams webpage
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2016, 12:25:43 PM »

I definately go for the highest standard of both. I suffer from shin splints - so all the protection possible please. has to be said, I usually only face 130 and under - but it can still hurt! Glove wise I think better safe than sorry. £20 worth a safer feeling in my mind.
Logged
Physiotherapist, Cricketplayer and gear-nut who likes to fiddle with wood.

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2016, 12:26:04 PM »

I'm known to be fussy gloves agree to disagree much of the test protection guff is just that...
Gloves I want flexible and tight to my hands.

Now pads top hats and size is what I want I like small pads and I use decent quality ones but look for only the vulnerable areas (under the knee role and calf area.)

Overall fit and feel is more important than quality as you have a bat...
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

HallamKeeper

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 363
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2016, 12:29:53 PM »

I tend to go for the top level protection. As others have said gloves seem to be an obvious thing to spend more money on. The same for keeping gloves for me as I know I will get bad knocks, I'd rather minimise the damage.

Leg pads I've had top level and the next grade down, no real difference, I chose them so my kit matched. Even the top ones every now and then when hit full on the pad in the nets don't stop a strong impact sensation (not quite pain but a good thud).

At the moment I can afford the more expensive stuff so I get it, if I have less money I'd probably go for the cheaper stuff. I suppose it is the same as someone who spends a lot of money on clothes etc.

Logged
The artist formerly known as CalverKeeper

Blank Bats

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Captain
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1158
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Blank Bats
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2016, 01:43:57 PM »

I think it depends on the standard you play.

If you're playing Sunday friendlies, with a lot of youngsters, then as a basic minimum, your requirements ought to be different from test players facing Steyn, Starc etc.

Logged
Blank Bats
http://www.blankbats.co.uk
For more info email blankbats@gmail.com

Mr_Orange

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2016, 01:53:58 PM »

As with most of the other responses, gloves I think are important to get as good a level as you can. Fingers are easily broken no matter what level you play at! I will always get high end gloves.

Pads wise, I've increased the level of protection since moving up a level in playing. I'm playing against some guys who have played professionally and felt it more if/when I got hit on the pad (using old Kookas that were 'Premier Club' standard). I changed to Recoil 900s soon after that were 'Test Match' level and I've stuck with that level ever since. I use GN Legends now and they're by far the best pads I've ever owned.   
Logged
"A natural mis-timer of the ball"

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2016, 02:00:21 PM »

Agreed on gloves, crap gloves ain't cool.

I buy reasonably expensive pads because they're more comfy with padded straps etc. I know I've said it before, but if someone made a set that were super light, comfy and as non-bulky as possible, I'd be all over it. Not that bothered about protection, all they need to do is stop it actually hurting when you get Shane Watson'ed.
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

WalkingWicket37

Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2016, 02:00:48 PM »

I think it depends on the standard you play.

If you're playing Sunday friendlies, with a lot of youngsters, then as a basic minimum, your requirements ought to be different from test players facing Steyn, Starc etc.

I like to be safe just in case one of those 13 year olds just making their way in adult cricket bowls at 90mph...  ;)
« Last Edit: November 19, 2016, 09:13:47 PM by WalkingWicket37 »
Logged

Blank Bats

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Captain
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1158
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Blank Bats
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2016, 02:03:15 PM »

I like to be safe just on case one of those 13 year olds just making their way in adult cricket bowls at 90mph...  ;)

More money than sense comes to mind.

But I like your thinking  :D
Logged
Blank Bats
http://www.blankbats.co.uk
For more info email blankbats@gmail.com

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2016, 02:04:20 PM »

What do people call test match protection on the gloves. (or are you just going off what the description says),

Funny but it is branded about a lot I love BAS players gloves which are simple and not overly obtrusive on your hands like some stormtrooper gloves where you feel your hands are miles from the bat.


Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Jaffa

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1529
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2016, 02:20:12 PM »

I did buy some GM OLE Sponsored players pads, just because I could. They were light, very well made and felt they could stop anything. The trouble for me was their bulk. It felt like I had two wheelie bins in front of me. I now use Puma Flex pads with the additional velcro padding taken out. You do feel it when you get hit but it is a gentle reminder to focus. I also have Kook players pads as spare (as you do) and they seem to offer the protection without the bulk.

Thigh pads are SFoxes which were seen as an man math investment. Personalised comfort and long lasting. The protection is a bonus.

Gloves are Ayrteks because they looked the best value for the money. Great feel and protection. I have also the Kook players just because I wanted to try the kangaroo leather.

Helmet is a Albion Ultimate 98. Very comfy and I've played around various grilles and have found a nice balance between vision and gap. The grille is titanium because I was able to get one cheap. That's the only reason honest.   ;)

Edit - Er, @19reading87 Reds , I sold the OLE pads to you. How did you get on with them?
« Last Edit: November 18, 2016, 02:24:56 PM by Jaffa »
Logged
Tell it to my bread in the morning. You just became my backup toaster.

19reading87

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7079
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: What level of protection do we really need?
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2016, 02:27:22 PM »

I did buy some GM OLE Sponsored players pads, just because I could. They were light, very well made and felt they could stop anything. The trouble for me was their bulk. It felt like I had two wheelie bins in front of me. I now use Puma Flex pads with the additional velcro padding taken out. You do feel it when you get hit but it is a gentle reminder to focus. I also have Kook players pads as spare (as you do) and they seem to offer the protection without the bulk.

Thigh pads are SFoxes which were seen as an man math investment. Personalised comfort and long lasting. The protection is a bonus.

Gloves are Ayrteks because they looked the best value for the money. Great feel and protection. I have also the Kook players just because I wanted to try the kangaroo leather.

Helmet is a Albion Ultimate 98. Very comfy and I've played around various grilles and have found a nice balance between vision and gap. The grille is titanium because I was able to get one cheap. That's the only reason honest.   ;)

Edit - Er, @19reading87 Reds , I sold the OLE pads to you. How did you get on with them?

You did indeed.... incredible pads! One of my biggest sale regrets!
Logged
Highest score: 147*          Best bowling: 6-20
Pages: [1] 2 3
 

Advertise on CBF