Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Not quite an emergency  (Read 5686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Canners

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5085
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • go hard or go home
Re: Not quite an emergency
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2017, 04:53:09 PM »

Awesome shape that and very big for such a light bat
Logged
I don't know how to put this, but, I'm kind of a big deal.

bostoncricketer

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Not quite an emergency
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2017, 05:24:40 PM »

Looks similar to 1271 Trott profile which averages at 2'15. Must be a super low density cleft.
Logged

Canners

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5085
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • go hard or go home
Re: Not quite an emergency
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2017, 05:54:34 PM »

Looks similar to 1271 Trott profile which averages at 2'15. Must be a super low density cleft.

Yes I thought that although I reckon it's a tweaked one
Logged
I don't know how to put this, but, I'm kind of a big deal.

adb club cricketer

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 949
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Not quite an emergency
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2017, 07:49:44 PM »

I think it is a misconception that lighter bats can't ping. I have a GM flare at 2-7 with 20-25 edges and 30 spine, and it pings amazing. also, I find with a lighter bat, I  have greater bat speed AND decide/play the ball much later, so any loss of ping effect compared to heavy bat can be compensated..and what you might lose in front foot shots, you gain in back foot shots, not to mention at end of a long innings, you dont feel tired..so i personally, see only advantages to lighter bats...
« Last Edit: June 28, 2017, 07:55:24 PM by adb club cricketer »
Logged

SAFC2403

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 176
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Not quite an emergency
« Reply #19 on: June 29, 2017, 07:37:25 AM »

I think it is a misconception that lighter bats can't ping. I have a GM flare at 2-7 with 20-25 edges and 30 spine, and it pings amazing. also, I find with a lighter bat, I  have greater bat speed AND decide/play the ball much later, so any loss of ping effect compared to heavy bat can be compensated..and what you might lose in front foot shots, you gain in back foot shots, not to mention at end of a long innings, you dont feel tired..so i personally, see only advantages to lighter bats...

For the last few years i have been using a GN Dynadrive and i noticed that the type of shots i was playing was being reduced. No pulls or hooks and basically drives and cuts only. this season i have switched to an older lighter bat and i'm now scoring much better and have a much better range of shots.

Lighter bats FTW!
Logged

LDifa

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Not quite an emergency
« Reply #20 on: June 29, 2017, 01:00:21 PM »

the number on the handle is 5717
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF