There has been a lot of discussion in the Ashes thread around the propensity in modern international cricket for the home team to win the vast majority of series - helped by familiarity with the conditions, lack of accilmatisation on the part of visiting sides and the like. It got me wondering - how would a series play out where none of that was a factor?
So, the parameters are as follows. England versus Australia. Both sides have to select a squad of 15 to cover the entire series. Everyone is fit and available at the start of the series, and there is an even ten day gap between the end of one game and the start of another. There is no holders advantage.
The grounds have been selected to allow for a range of conditions, and reflect a little my personal favourite Test grounds, as well as those that provide the most interesting challenges for the players. Assume for the purposes of this discussion that all are played in high season conditions.
1st Test: Newlands, Cape Town
2nd Test: The Hagley Park Oval, Christchurch
3rd Test: WACA, Perth
4th Test: Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium, Delhi
5th Test: Trent Bridge, Nottingham
6th Test: Galle International Stadium, Galle
If the series is level after six, a deciding timeless test will be played at Lords (I thought about having it at the MCG, but even time has its limits...)