Ben Stokes Trial
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10

Author Topic: Ben Stokes Trial  (Read 21524 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Johnny

  • Administrator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4566
  • Trade Count: (+9)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #45 on: August 13, 2018, 06:07:50 PM »

Sounds like the defence have landed Alex Hales in the doodoo, basically claiming that injuries to the guy that fractured his eyesocket were likely due to Hales kicking him
Logged
Email - Johnny@CustomBats.co.uk
Twitter - www.twitter.com/CustomBatsForum
Facebook - www.facebook.com/CustomBatsForum

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #46 on: August 13, 2018, 09:33:15 PM »

^ Uh oh! Hales is going to hate Stokes as long as they play together. :D
Logged

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #47 on: August 13, 2018, 09:40:27 PM »

Hales will have to take it on the chin. He lucky he has not been there with Stokes for the last week.

The two main people this event evolved around not called by defence or prosecution. I find that odd.
Logged

Boondougal

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 906
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #48 on: August 13, 2018, 10:40:00 PM »

Sounds like the defence have landed Alex Hales in the doodoo, basically claiming that injuries to the guy that fractured his eyesocket were likely due to Hales kicking him

Means nothing really.. the charge is affray so its all about if the threat existed to a bystander....

Logged

Seniorplayer

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6236
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #49 on: August 14, 2018, 07:09:28 AM »

Jury to reconvene to deliberate on what's been said from 10am today
Logged

LEACHY48

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2277
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #50 on: August 14, 2018, 07:28:07 AM »

Means nothing really.. the charge is affray so its all about if the threat existed to a bystander....

Not strictly true, doesn’t have to have been a direct threat to a bystander, basically all the jury have to believe is that:

1) there was unlawful violence towards another (clearly was)
2) any reasonable person would have feared for their safety if they witnessed what was occurring - that’s the tough one
Logged

Warneymonster

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 868
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #51 on: August 14, 2018, 09:54:16 AM »

im sceptical as to why neither defence or prosecution brought in the gay couple who seem to be central to it. surely if their version of events backed up either side they would have used it to their advantage?

Only he knows whether he started (and won) the fight or not, but the fact that they brought bottles into it gives him a chance of a defence.
Logged

alexhilly1492

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3117
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #52 on: August 14, 2018, 11:47:53 AM »

Bbc breaking news: stokes found not guilty
Logged
HS: 77*, 73*, 61*, 61*, 54*, 50*
BB: 7-4-9-5, 7.3-0-29-5

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #53 on: August 14, 2018, 11:48:38 AM »

Bbc breaking news: stokes found not guilty

As was the other guy too
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #54 on: August 14, 2018, 11:48:42 AM »

So there you go. Don't make judgements until you know all the information. And that's clearly not been reported to the general public.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #55 on: August 14, 2018, 12:02:02 PM »

Anti Climactic for the haters!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #56 on: August 14, 2018, 12:04:24 PM »

Logged

northernboy1987

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2350
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #57 on: August 14, 2018, 12:13:05 PM »

Wouldn't have even gone to trial if he wasn't famous. Glad we can get on with the cricket now.
Logged
"The hallmark of a great captain is the ability to win the toss at the right time" - Richie Benaud

https://twitter.com/matteden87

tate035

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 508
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #58 on: August 14, 2018, 12:27:41 PM »

Wouldn't have even gone to trial if he wasn't famous. Glad we can get on with the cricket now.
What a complete and utter waste of time and money.. There has been a verdict given and the ECB or a committee acting on their behalf should adhere to it.. Stokes and his family has been.through enough and I'm sure he has learnt from his actions.

I like a few others have been amazed with what Hales got away with but the CPS saw no reason to prosecute him..

I would rather the ECB used this money and put it into amateur cricket where it would be better used..

Poor again from the ECB....
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Ben Stokes Trial
« Reply #59 on: August 14, 2018, 12:34:58 PM »

What a complete and utter waste of time and money.. There has been a verdict given and the ECB or a committee acting on their behalf should adhere to it.. Stokes and his family has been.through enough and I'm sure he has learnt from his actions.

I like a few others have been amazed with what Hales got away with but the CPS saw no reason to prosecute him..

I would rather the ECB used this money and put it into amateur cricket where it would be better used..

Poor again from the ECB....
This is somewhat different - it's the Cricket Disciplinary Committee and Hales and Stokes are charged with bringing the game into disrepute.

Given there is footage of the alleged affray all over the web, and it went to trial, I'm fairly sure that's going to be a little more difficult to get out of...
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
 

Advertise on CBF